WOW the Coast Gaurd ?

[mike84z28]

http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2013...-dawn-raid-on-reporter-home-raises-questions/

 

[SVT]

Amerika, **** Yeah!

 

[Expert684]

Yea, just read it! Wow a gun cleaning kit is against the law! What next? Sounds like storm troopers hit the house. Makes you wonder who is next?

 

[SVT]

Please everyone, do not blame the officers/agents involved...I'm sure they were just "following" orders. I mean these people "supposedly" had unregistered guns and did have an illegal potato gun, so obviously they got what they deserved.

 

[AustinBR]

Please everyone, do not blame the officers/agents involved...I'm sure they were just "following" orders. I mean these people "supposedly" had unregistered guns and did have an illegal potato gun, so obviously they got what they deserved.

I would be interested in hearing their side of the story. For some reason I question the validity of her story.

 

[SVT]

I would be interested in hearing their side of the story. For some reason I question the validity of her story.

well, it is an "opinion" piece so you never know what she cooked up

 

[Jack]

An opinion piece written by one journalist to back up another journalist, on Fox News, complaining about Obama policy. A wide range of possible biases, half truths, and whole lies, come to mind.

 

[AustinBR]

well, it is an "opinion" piece so you never know what she cooked up

Bingo. Look at it analytically. She is probably exaggerating a good bit. If the department of Homeland Security really took some of her documents...well...they were probably questionable to be in her possession. Play stupid games and stick your nose where it doesn't belong and you get stupid results, ie, bad things happen to you.

 

[oldsman350]

Hey as long as everybody went home safe that's all that matters!!

 

[SVT]

Bingo. Look at it analytically. She is probably exaggerating a good bit. If the department of Homeland Security really took some of her documents...well...they were probably questionable to be in her possession. Play stupid games and stick your nose where it doesn't belong and you get stupid results, ie, bad things happen to you.

yeah, investigative journalism should be outlawed, or is that not what you meant?

Hey as long as everybody went home safe that's all that matters!!

 

[Vanilla Gorilla]

Thanks for fighting the good fight SVT! Without you raging against the machine where would we all be? What have you done to fight the fight? I'll tell you what it looks like to me; you begged your way back onto the board with promises to change, that lasted all of two weeks and now we are back to the same old you. Your commitment to change was staggering sir!

 

[Jack]

yeah, investigative journalism should be outlawed, or is that not what you meant?

I think he meant blindly accepting something just because it supports your view is foolish.

 

[SVT]

I think he meant blindly accepting something just because it supports your view is foolish.

I would agree if that's what he meant.

 

[Jack]

I would agree if that's what he meant.

And yet, this is what you did.

 

[SVT]

And yet, this is what you did.

then call me foolish

 

[Jack]

No need to, I just don't understand how you realize it isn't a good thought process, but follow it anyways.

 

[SVT]

No need to, I just don't understand how you realize it isn't a good thought process, but follow it anyways.

I just assumed it was obvious that people's comments were being made based on the information in the links as being true. Obviously things could be purposefully skewed in every article posted here. I just choose to post assuming the information is accurate.

 

[03protege]

There must be some truth to what the homeowner was saying if they did not charge her with anything right?

 

[Vanilla Gorilla]

There must be some truth to what the homeowner was saying if they did not charge her with anything right?

I don't think that's a safe assumption at all given the way the feds work. It is likely that they would indict later.

 

[Jack]

I just assumed it was obvious that people's comments were being made based on the information in the links as being true. Obviously things could be purposefully skewed in every article posted here. I just choose to post assuming the information is accurate.

If there was an article written by a Journalist married to the head of the NSA and working for whatever news agency is the opposite of infowars, that said that through her extensive investigation, she has determined there has never and will never be any government abuses in the NSA. Will you accept it and move on, or will you realize the conflict of interest/likelihood of misinformation?