Banning targets now? Wow...

Magdump · Jan 14, 2015

How far will any government go to have total control over the public?
I can't even begin to understand this proposal. The targets mentioned aren't even a depiction of a human. And they are the standard for training law enforcement and military.

http://www.outdoorhub.com/news/2015...awmaker-propose-ban-human-silhouette-targets/

Saintsfan6 · Jan 14, 2015

Wow...

Magdump · Jan 14, 2015

Massachusetts has already banned them.

MALIBU12 · Jan 14, 2015

Yep, that will stop the thugs from killing people....just like bans on high capacity mags and banning guns ! DERP!

swamper · Jan 14, 2015

All of the targets I shoot are the upper half of centaurs. Problem solved!

Saintsfan6 · Jan 14, 2015

swamper said:
All of the targets I shoot are the upper half of centaurs. Problem solved!

I_FLY_LOW · Jan 14, 2015

I bet it's because they're black....

Sig220 · Jan 14, 2015

I say we make them in white and call them bowling pin targets!!!

Makes about as much sense as a gun free zone........

Magdump · Jan 14, 2015

I_FLY_LOW said:
I bet it's because they're black....

I bet you're correct!

LNSvince · Jan 14, 2015

What if we "Freehand" sketch one on site ?

"Ill just freehand a Monet to shoot at while you get your gear out"

330px-Pierre-Auguste_Renoir%2C_1875%2C_Claude_Monet%2C_oil_on_canvas%2C_84_x_60.5_cm%2C_Mus%C3%A9e_d%27Orsay%2C_Paris.jpg

LNSvince · Jan 14, 2015

Maybe its time to give up the business.
Get hurt on the job and sign up on that disability thing, so these laws wont apply to me.
Seems easier that way

Rainsdrops · Jan 14, 2015

Targets in the article are blue. It looks as if they want to stop us from shooting at human shaped / sized targets. I think they are stupid, but its the government

tallwalker · Jan 14, 2015

Just shoot at a normal bullseye. With the obligatory smiley face painted in just to tweak them of course.

Magdump · Jan 16, 2015

tallwalker said:
just shoot at a normal bullseye. With the obligatory smiley face painted in just to tweak them of course.

hahahahahahahahahahaha!!!
Ftw!

madwabbit · Jan 16, 2015

It was illegal at most of the gun ranges up north a few years ago. "No human-style silhouettes allowed"

When I moved to louisiana I was like "can I shoot silhouette target stuff like zombies, bad guys, terrorists..."

"uh... Son yer jus shootin' paper..."

Yeah, they don't think like that some places.

Gator 45/70 · Jan 16, 2015

The derpism is strong up North.

Emperor · Jan 16, 2015

You guys are wrong. This is all part of the grand master plan to diminish the interest in firearms use in general. Let's face it, the heavy handed approach by anti-2nd Amendment morons to regulate or eliminate private ownership of guns and firearms is not working! Nor, will it ever work. They are now realizing that. So like a rat gnaws at an electrical wire in the attic until he shorts it, they chip away at the symbols of gun ownership bits at a time.

Look at the polls on gun ownership! well over 70% of the US population believes in the Right of people to own firearms and believes the 2nd Amendment guarantees that Right. It's not even close for the antigun idiots and they know it.

If you have a 5 gallon bucket full of beans, and you let someone take a bean everyday, no one notices the beans being taken for quite some time.

madwabbit · Jan 16, 2015

Emperor said:
You guys are wrong. This is all part of the grand master plan to diminish the interest in firearms use in general. Let's face it, the heavy handed approach by anti-2nd Amendment morons to regulate or eliminate private ownership of guns and firearms is not working! Nor, will it ever work. They are now realizing that. So like a rat gnaws at an electrical wire in the attic until he shorts it, they chip away at the symbols of gun ownership bits at a time.

Look at the polls on gun ownership! well over 70% of the US population believes in the Right of people to own firearms and believes the 2nd Amendment guarantees that Right. It's not even close for the antigun idiots and they know it.

If you have a 5 gallon bucket full of beans, and you let someone take a bean everyday, no one notices the beans being taken for quite some time.

I'm not advocating giving them an inch, but historically regardless of what political party reigns- guns have been widely off limits. Thats sacred ground and elected officials (as a whole) know it. Look at the recent elections - conservatives cleaned house in a big way. There were a lot of independents and undecided that jumped in because of liberal legislation.

whodat247 · Jan 16, 2015

That's INSANE!

Emperor · Jan 16, 2015

madwabbit said:
I'm not advocating giving them an inch, but historically regardless of what political party reigns- guns have been widely off limits. Thats sacred ground and elected officials (as a whole) know it. Look at the recent elections - conservatives cleaned house in a big way. There were a lot of independents and undecided that jumped in because of liberal legislation.

I agree! What is not happening is these ideologically challenged retards staying put in the places they destroy. Does anyone here care if no one in New York State can ever own a gun again; other than what the 2nd Amendment stands for, that is? I doubt you do. And if they made that place so inhospitable to guns, fine! But let them keep their f'n asses up there. Don't install the type of stupid crap that promotes your idiocy, watch the place crumble and grovel to criminals, and then move somewhere else.

These mentally deficient clowns are really like locusts' plague!

Banning targets now? Wow...

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

Don’t troll me bro!

Well-Known Member

Don’t troll me bro!

Well-Known Member

Curmudgeon in Training

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Don’t troll me bro!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Don’t troll me bro!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Seriously Misunderstood!

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Seriously Misunderstood!

Log in

Forum statistics