I knew this was going to be a bad thing...

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

http://www.wbrz.com/news/broome-rol...ium=social&utm_source=facebook_WBRZ_Channel_2

- Officers are required to give a verbal warning before using deadly force except where there are extingent circumstances.

- Officers are required to de-escalate situations when possible before using force. De-escalation strategies include: disengagement, area containment, waiting out a subject, summoning re-enforcements, calling in specialized units, or other strategies.

- Officers will not employ choke holds or strangleholds except in emergency circumstances where it is immediately necessary to use deadly force and the authorized weapons are inoperable, not accessible or not available.

- Officers are prohibited from discharging a firearm at a moving vehicle unless the vehicle or the passengers pose an immediate deadly threat to others.

- Officers will be required to intervene to prevent another officer from using excessive force and to immediately report they observed the use of excessive force by another officer.

At least she wasn't wearing her bloody shirt... I feel sorry for you BRPD guys that have to deal with this woman. She's going to be after y'all like crazy.

UnseenUSPCompact · Feb 2, 2017

Wouldn't a moral police officer already be doing these things?

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

LOL! Yeah, I'm pretty sure they do... In the AS incident I'm pretty sure they did all these things. She just wants to refuse to see it. I heard a ton of verbal commands that were ignored before they got physical!

whitsend · Feb 2, 2017

MEM commented on the article.

Mark edward marchiafava • 18 hours ago
Fact: cops have NO constitutional or statutory duty to protect anyone.
Why continue to finance this false sense of security which is, in reality, a police state?
• Reply•Share ›

Don't you miss him?????

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

I can only get a few comments deep on FB before I have to quit reading them... And some think the drama here is bad!

Sniper56 · Feb 2, 2017

This will make those officers jobs more dangerous.

dantheman · Feb 2, 2017

More pandering to her base . She promised them she would rein in the Popo.

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

dantheman said:
More pandering to her base . She promised them she would rein in the Popo.

Maybe she should focus on reining in the crime in North BR...

dantheman · Feb 2, 2017

JeeperCreeper said:
Maybe she should focus on reining in the crime in North BR...

Nah , she's going to fix that problem by throwing money at it and encouraging outside investment .

Whitebread · Feb 2, 2017

Warning labels the ruination of this country. If you have to be told if you fight a cop and try to pull your gun, that he may shoot you. Then you are the human equivalent of a 5 year old cow horn spike, and we don't need you breeding with any more does.

I'm sure some moron will read this and say "but whitebread you are very vocal about individual liberty and one of the things wrong with this country is we accept stupid laws." To that person, stop reading warning labels because you a too slow to grasp the difference.

Sorry that was rude there's a big difference and I am at this time unwilling to explain.

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

dantheman said:
Nah , she's going to fix that problem by throwing money at it and encouraging outside investment .

I know, let's not face the true problem head on, but beat around the bush and make matters worse by not addressing the true issue. We needed Bodi, Things will only get worse under her reign.

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

Whitebread said:
Warning labels the ruination of this country. If you have to be told if you fight a cop and try to pull your gun, that he may shoot you. Then you are the human equivalent of a 5 year old cow horn spike, and we don't need you breeding with any more does.

I'm sure some moron will read this and say "but whitebread you are very vocal about individual liberty and one of the things wrong with this country is we accept stupid laws." To that person, stop reading warning labels because you a too slow to grasp the difference.

The sad part is that his kids have only been indoctrinated that the authorities are to blame for the death of their father, and will probably be worse than he was, or at least be advocates for violence against cops.

As far as personal liberties go... I think we all know my stance on harsher penalties and capital punishment for rapists, violent offenders and murderers.

sliguns · Feb 2, 2017

UnseenUSPCompact said:
Wouldn't a moral police officer already be doing these things?

Pacioli · Feb 2, 2017

She is making the Ferguson Effect a policy. Next she will run off Chief Dabadie. Crime rates will not move favorably.

340six · Feb 2, 2017

JeeperCreeper said:
I can only get a few comments deep on FB before I have to quit reading them... And some think the drama here is bad!

I think you should volunteer to be a facebook moderator

JeeperCreeper · Feb 2, 2017

340six said:
I think you should volunteer to be a facebook moderator

Nah, I want nothing to do with trying to babysit that crowd.

Or this crowd for that matter...

340six · Feb 2, 2017

I hear ya they have this JeeperCreeper guy that...........oh never mind

Whitebread · Feb 2, 2017

JeeperCreeper said:
Nah, I want nothing to do with trying to babysit that crowd.

Or this crowd for that matter...

UnseenUSPCompact · Feb 2, 2017

I don't particularly like the mayor and I don't think this should of had to be said because in actuality, ANY police agency that actually cared about being a morally justifiable and "good" police department would already have these policies in place. Lets walk through them.

- Officers are required to give a verbal warning before using deadly force except where there are extingent circumstances.

This means if a man has a knife they can't just jump out of the car and shoot the guy unless he/she is actively stabbing somebody or charging an officer. Was this NOT already policy? If ANYBODY's life is in danger the officer has the option of lethal force. No NEW danger to the officer has been created.

- Officers are required to de-escalate situations when possible before using force. De-escalation strategies include: disengagement, area containment, waiting out a subject, summoning re-enforcements, calling in specialized units, or other strategies.

Why wouldn't this ALREADY be policy? Why on earth wouldn't you want to de-escalate ANY situation nomatter the severity? If anything de-escalating a situation would in theory make the officers and public safer. No NEW danger to the officer has been created.

- Officers will not employ choke holds or strangleholds except in emergency circumstances where it is immediately necessary to use deadly force and the authorized weapons are inoperable, not accessible or not available.

This does not take away any actions the officer would need to use in a life or death situation. It simply means don't choke out a 15 year old shoplifter at Walmart or a fat guy selling lose cigarettes. If the guy is attacking you or somebody else and a life threatening situation is present, CHOKE HIS A$$ OUT! No NEW danger to the officer has been created.

- Officers are prohibited from discharging a firearm at a moving vehicle unless the vehicle or the passengers pose an immediate deadly threat to others.

I wonder why it wouldn't be a great idea to shoot at moving targets in highly populated areas without knowing the contents of a vehicle *sarcasm* unless there is a direct threat to life from that vehicle. Why isn't this already policy? No NEW danger to the officer has been created.

- Officers will be required to intervene to prevent another officer from using excessive force and to immediately report they observed the use of excessive force by another officer.

If an officer is being a douchebag and doing unlawful things then other officers should feel the need to protect the public from this person. Why is this not already policy? No NEW danger to the officer has been created.

We can talk about politics and how much this release plays a part in those politics, but at the end of the day don't sit here and act like police lives are on the line from these policies. If you are an officer and using deadly force outside of these policies then you prob shouldn't be a police officer. Half the problems with this country and political system is we cant get away from the team mentality and whatever the "other side" does will always be wrong even when its logical.

UnseenUSPCompact · Feb 2, 2017

JeeperCreeper said:
LOL! Yeah, I'm pretty sure they do... In the AS incident I'm pretty sure they did all these things. She just wants to refuse to see it. I heard a ton of verbal commands that were ignored before they got physical!

In my opinion, the officers in the AS case acted professionally and within a reasonable fashion. (just wanted to clarify that with my previous statement)

I knew this was going to be a bad thing...

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

*Banned*

Well-Known Member

*Banned*

-Global Mod-

*Banned*

Well-Known Member

I despise ARFCOM

*Banned*

I despise ARFCOM

*Banned*

*Banned*

*Banned*

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

-Global Mod-

*Banned*

-Global Mod-

*Banned*

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Log in

Forum statistics

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned