The ccw class I recently took has me thinking. The instructor made the valid point about the benefits of having different sized guns on the same platform (he had 3 differnt sized glocks- I'm not a glock fan but... it has me thinking).
I'm currently running a keltec 32, 380, shield 9mm w/ safety, S&W 469, and 1911. Every one is different. Different setups. Safety up, safety down, no safety. Different calibers. single action. striker fired, da/sa. All over the place.
I'm considering selling the 1911 ( !!! ) to buy a M&P2 full sized 9mm setup... more mag capacity, consolidate my ammo to 9mm (plus ammo is cheaper). It seems that the 2nd gen m&p has a decent trigger. The gun is lighter (not sure about fully loaded how they compare ).
On the down side, its plastic and lacks character. Its not a 1911. I'd miss the 1911 trigger.
Thoughts.... somebody talk me into this... or out of it!
I'm currently running a keltec 32, 380, shield 9mm w/ safety, S&W 469, and 1911. Every one is different. Different setups. Safety up, safety down, no safety. Different calibers. single action. striker fired, da/sa. All over the place.
I'm considering selling the 1911 ( !!! ) to buy a M&P2 full sized 9mm setup... more mag capacity, consolidate my ammo to 9mm (plus ammo is cheaper). It seems that the 2nd gen m&p has a decent trigger. The gun is lighter (not sure about fully loaded how they compare ).
On the down side, its plastic and lacks character. Its not a 1911. I'd miss the 1911 trigger.
Thoughts.... somebody talk me into this... or out of it!