Sorry...my bad...I was wrong. I was reading and replying on my phone between stops today and thought it was you had posted it. Looking back now I see it was someone else and the post wasn't deleted. My apologies.
Tammany Trace carry
- Thread starter nolaradio
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
- Status
Sorry...my bad...I was wrong. I was reading and replying on my phone between stops today and thought it was you had posted it. Looking back now I see it was someone else and the post wasn't deleted. My apologies.
I'm not trying to confront people. I just don't usually sugar coat things and that can rub some people the wrong way. And I did make a mistake. But it wasn't because of my desire to confront them or I'd have gone on about the post I thought was deleted. And when I recognized I made the mistake, I explained how the mistake was made. I gave a reason for the mistake, not an excuse. And I concluded with an apology. That's hardly confrontational behavior. Perhaps you have a different perspective.
Because I'm in the car a lot, I listen to a lot of books on tape. Maybe I should see if this one is available.
Last edited:
leadslinger972
*Banned*
I just see you skirting around my question.
Gator 45/70
Well-Known Member
You have any popcorn?
Ok.
What's my opinion about what? The law? Nathan's interpretation?
I think this was addressed.
Sounds like a stop on Bayou St. John just outside of City Park after the Park was “closed.”
leadslinger972
*Banned*
Your expert LEO opinion about the law in regards to this topic, in this thread, where there are five pages of posts, which consist mostly of you trying to act like a cool kid and failing miserably.
No. Moonwalk. Mike?
Not Mike, but that sounds like a typical 3rd or 8th district case. The little bit of time I spent in those two districts I made sure I didn’t pick up on certain habits...
I personally disagree with it. By making a law that denies the law abiding citizen the opportunity to defend themselves they are giving the advantage to the criminal. I believe if the government is going to restrict your ability to defend yourself, they should be made to provide that protection for you. Like in a courthouse.
But my expert LEO opinion says I don't really have an opinion. It's my job to enforce the laws, even the ones I don't agree with. I don't know what the signs say at the actual trail but the differences between the website and the law makes it easier to use some discretion. Sometimes, as an LEO, you have to enforce laws you don't agree with.
As a "jump out boy" we would do plainclothes work in that area if the 64's got too bad. We used the ordinance to our advantage when we could.
alpinehyperlite
Well-Known Member
It went askew when someone tried to white knight someone who didn’t really need any protection. *
leadslinger972
*Banned*
Cool.
So you agree that it doesn't ****ing matter if someone asks Nathan Hale if they are a lawyer?
Yeah, well being a “jump out boy” making ******** municipal arrests wasn’t looked kindly upon in other districts.
State arrests (not 17F’s either) is what kept you out of a powder blue shirt working on the watch.
- Status
Latest posts
-
-
-
WTS: (Final price drop) New Tanfoglio Limited Pro Large Frame 9mm
- Latest: terrencetec
-
-
-
