Tammany Trace carry

MOTOR51 · Jan 10, 2018

thperez1972 said:
I wasn't called out. It was actually you. That's what started all this. You didn't like it and got defensive, telling me to stay in my lane. You're the one who asked an irrelevant question. You kept telling me to stop telling you it was irrelevant but no relivence was ever mentioned. At least not by you. Bigtattoo79, on the other hand, did. If Hale was a lawyer, the information would be more credible. If Hale was not, the information would be taken with a grain of salt. Can you hear how crazy that sounds? Claiming the accuracy of the information changes with his profession even though the information itself doesn't change. Believe it or not, I was trying to help you. You at least made up an unrelated scenario about going to a lawyer over a plumber for legal advice (I would go to the lawyer as well) and had enough sense to deflect when I tried to bring it back.

So if you'd like to keep this in the open, so be it. You can't say I didn't offer. If you want to suggest, or in the case of bigtattoo79 flat out say, the accuracy of the information will change based on Hale's profession, so be it. I certainly hope I'm not the only one who sees how crazy that sounds.

You are blinded by your arrogance. I do not have to explain a question to you that I asked someone else. I haven’t seen a rule that says I need your approval to ask a question. Keep making yourself look like an ass, it’s entertaining.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

MOTOR51 said:
You are blinded by your arrogance. I do not have to explain a question to you that I asked someone else. I haven’t seen a rule that says I need your approval to ask a question. Keep making yourself look like an ass, it’s entertaining.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro

You don't need my approval. That was my point from the beginning. It's a public forum. We don't need someone's approval to join the conversation. Now you're starting to get it.

charlie12 · Jan 10, 2018

Gator 45/70 · Jan 10, 2018

charlie12 said:
Damn

+2

nolaradio · Jan 10, 2018

leadslinger972 said:
Look here, Radio. The only thing you're doing is making yourself look stupid. If you are not the worst moderator on this forum, then there are bigger issues with this place.

If that was directed at me, I think you got the wrong user.

bigtattoo79 · Jan 10, 2018

bigtattoo79 said:
Now I have often wondered if Nathan was a lawyer also. Not because I feel he is wrong or right but only because if he is I would give his replies more credit. If he’s not I would take his opinion with a grain of salt.

thperez1972 said:
So if you'd like to keep this in the open, so be it. You can't say I didn't offer. If you want to suggest, or in the case of bigtattoo79 flat out say, the accuracy of the information will change based on Hale's profession, so be it. I certainly hope I'm not the only one who sees how crazy that sounds.

I never said it *WILL* change! I said he could be right or wrong I wasn’t sure. He post a LOT of legal info over the years and I don’t know his background. When trusting the legal advise of others wouldn’t you take a lawyers advice over a taxicab drivers? *Of course the taxicab driver COULD be right*.

With all the legal info Nathan post he shouldn’t be offended by that question. And we don’t know if he was offended but it definitely hit a nerve with you *why I don’t know*.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

bigtattoo79 said:
I never said it *WILL* change! I said he could be right or wrong I wasn’t sure. He post a LOT of legal info over the years and I don’t know his background. When trusting the legal advise of others wouldn’t you take a lawyers advice over a taxicab drivers? *Of course the taxicab driver COULD be right*.

With all the legal info Nathan post he shouldn’t be offended by that question. And we don’t know if he was offended but it definitely hit a nerve with you *why I don’t know*.

I would trust the accurate advice, regardless of the source.

Suppose the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave you the same information. Which one's information was more accurate?

leadslinger972 · Jan 10, 2018

nolaradio said:
If that was directed at me, I think you got the wrong user.

I take it you've never seen the movie Radio.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

bigtattoo79 said:
I never said it *WILL* change! I said he could be right or wrong I wasn’t sure. He post a LOT of legal info over the years and I don’t know his background. When trusting the legal advise of others wouldn’t you take a lawyers advice over a taxicab drivers? *Of course the taxicab driver COULD be right*.

With all the legal info Nathan post he shouldn’t be offended by that question. And we don’t know if he was offended but it definitely hit a nerve with you *why I don’t know*.

It didn't hit a nerve with me. All I did was correct motor 51's incorrect logic. That set him off.

leadslinger972 · Jan 10, 2018

thperez1972 said:
I would trust the accurate advice, regardless of the source.

Suppose the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave you the same information. Which one's information was more accurate?

You do you, buddy. No need to spread your herpes any further.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

leadslinger972 said:
You do you, buddy. No need to spread your herpes any further.

Suppose the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave you the same information. Which one's information was more accurate?

nolaradio · Jan 10, 2018

leadslinger972 said:
I take it you've never seen the movie Radio.

No I have not. Sorry.

Sent from the Bayou Bunker Command Center, Portable Unit #33, FEMA Region 6.

leadslinger972 · Jan 10, 2018

thperez1972 said:
Suppose the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave you the same information. Which one's information was more accurate?

Suppose no one cares.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

leadslinger972 said:
Suppose no one cares.

Then there wouldn't be 8 pages in this thread devoted to that very question.

charlie12 · Jan 10, 2018

Wouldn't be 8 pages if nobody would have jump in Motor's **** when he just asked a question for Nathan. Damn new people

bigtattoo79 · Jan 10, 2018

thperez1972 said:
I would trust the accurate advice, regardless of the source.

Suppose the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave you the same information. Which one's information was more accurate?

How do you know the info from one person was accurate if you don’t question the source to some extent. Again he could be 100% correct but I don’t know his history involving law.

If the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave the same advice I would say they were equally accurate. Now the question for you is what if the taxicab driver and the lawyer gave you different information. Who’s is more accurate?

Also I’ve seen MANY cases that the taxicab drivers info was spot on but I’m more likely to double check it given the source.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

charlie12 said:
Wouldn't be 8 pages if nobody would have jump in Motor's **** when he just asked a question for Nathan. Damn new people

I asked him if he had any issue with the information itself and if he thought the information must be bad if Nathan was not a lawyer.

leadslinger972 · Jan 10, 2018

thperez1972 said:
I asked him if he had any issue with the information itself and if he thought the information must be bad if Nathan was not a lawyer.

Your idiocy is what caused all of this. The question wasn't for you, nor does it pertain to the credibility of the information Nathan posted.

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

bigtattoo79 said:
How do you know the info from one person was accurate if you don’t question the source to some extent. Again he could be 100% correct but I don’t know his history involving law.

If the taxicab driver and the lawyer both gave the same advice I would say they were equally accurate. Now the question for you is what if the taxicab driver and the lawyer gave you different information. Who’s is more accurate?

Also I’ve seen MANY cases that the taxicab drivers info was spot on but I’m more likely to double check it given the source.

How do you know the info is correct? You double check the info. Using the profession to verify the info is, frankly, the lazy and inaccurate way. But it's quick and easy so it takes the place of more critical thinking so most people use it a lot, myself included.

Yes, the same information from multiple sources are equally accurate. And that's what he have here when motor51 asked in Nathan was a lawyer. The question had 2 possible answers.
1. Lawyer Nathan gave some information.
2. Non-lawyer Nathan gave some information.
It's the same information in both possibilities. As you said, they are both equally accurate. Which brings us back to the beginning of this mess. The question is irrelevant when evaluating the provided information. Now the information may be spot on or it may be dead wrong. I'm not arguing Nathan is a legal genius. I'm just trying to keep things on topic and evaluate the information itself. Put it under scrutiny rather than the source of the information. Because, as you stated, the source of the information does not determine its accuracy. Can we agree on that before we move on to if they had given different information?

thperez1972 · Jan 10, 2018

leadslinger972 said:
The question wasn't for you, nor does it pertain to the credibility of the information Nathan posted.

That's been my point all along. It's so refreshing to see that you agree with me.

Tammany Trace carry

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

Well-Known Member

ESSAYONS

Not a Fed.

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

ESSAYONS

*Banned*

ESSAYONS

*Banned*

ESSAYONS

Well-Known Member

*Banned*

ESSAYONS

Not a Fed.

Well-Known Member

ESSAYONS

*Banned*

ESSAYONS

ESSAYONS

Log in

Forum statistics

Banned

Banned

Banned

Banned