Cut Off Gun Range

MA Assault Weapon Ban Upheld by Federal District Court

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!

    • Register Log in
    S

    stoic

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2008
    22
    3
    https://www.bloomberg.com/news/arti...an-on-assault-weapons-upheld-by-federal-judge

    Opinion
    https://www.mass.gov/files/documents/2018/04/06/Worman dismissal-SJ ruling 4-6-18.pdf

    As expected, liberal judges are ignoring the "in common use" provision of the SCOTUS's decision in Heller v. District of Columbia. Yet, the judge here was a Reagan appointee!

    We'll see what happens with the appeal in the Federal First Circuit Court of Appeals. I wonder whether this Court will follow the recent decision of Kolbe by the Federal Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals which was denied certiorari by the Supreme Court.

    http://www.ca4.uscourts.gov/Opinions/Published/141945A.P.pdf
     
    Last edited:
    S

    shrxfn

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Oct 25, 2015
    857
    28
    SWLA
    What the idiots don't understand is that all firearms are copies of military weapons all the way back to the flintlock. The military spends the money to get the best weapons and the manufacturers are always coming out with the latest new and improved doo-dad and then it trickles down to us plebes.

    On the other hand I heard that London has surpassed NY as the city with most deaths. But to be fair the people in London where stabbed with assualt knives so get ready for the ban hammer on those.
     
    CatCam

    CatCam

    Ready, Shoot, Aim!
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Feb 20, 2013
    1,028
    63
    I hear certain towns will label themselves as "Gun Sanctuary" towns to protect our 2nd Amendment rights and at the same time increase property values!
     
    sandman7925

    sandman7925

    Wealthy women wanted
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    May 16, 2010
    3,559
    48
    False River
    I’ll catch **** for this but I’m gonna say it. I’m to the point where I support states/cities banning what they want too. I think That’s the only way that at some point we all don’t lose them. And if someone in a banned area doesn’t like it move away. Let them have their idea of paradise and we’ll have ours.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    RaleighReloader

    RaleighReloader

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    34   0   0
    Jan 30, 2015
    1,177
    48
    Baton Rouge, LA
    sandman7925 said:
    I’ll catch **** for this but I’m gonna say it. I’m to the point where I support states/cities banning what they want too. I think That’s the only way that at some point we all don’t lose them. And if someone in a banned area doesn’t like it move away. Let them have their idea of paradise and we’ll have ours.
    Click to expand...

    I agree. If I have to pick the lesser of the evils between cities legislating gun control and the federal government legislating gun control, I'll pick cities every time.

    Speaking of which, I'm told that come cities in Florida are now suing the state over its firearms pre-emption laws. Should be interesting to see where that goes.

    Mike
     
    tigerfan_9

    tigerfan_9

    1000 Yard Club
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Mar 2, 2009
    342
    16
    New Iberia, LA
    sandman7925 said:
    I’ll catch **** for this but I’m gonna say it. I’m to the point where I support states/cities banning what they want too. I think That’s the only way that at some point we all don’t lose them. And if someone in a banned area doesn’t like it move away. Let them have their idea of paradise and we’ll have ours.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
    Click to expand...

    You think they will stop at a city? Ha
     
    S

    stoic

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 14, 2008
    22
    3
    It's one thing to support the right of States and communities to govern themselves through the democratic process, but, in this instance, the MA Attorney General, substituted her own judgment for MA and every community therein. She bypassed the democratic process and the MA State legislature by implementing her own interpretation of MA's Assault Weapons Ban which went beyond what the MA Legislature previously passed as written law. Instead of enforcing what the actual law says, she expanded its definitions to advance her gun control agenda.
     
    O

    Old School

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 19, 2012
    625
    28
    DTR
    If you are willing to move every time laws are passed that aren’t to your liking, get ready to do a whole lot of moving.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    M

    m1k3

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Mar 25, 2012
    67
    8
    Central, LA
    So with this type of rationale with the 2nd Amendment, should this also apply to the rest of the Bill of Rights? Should cities and states be able to regulate speech and religion?
     
    O

    Old School

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 19, 2012
    625
    28
    DTR
    Municipalities and College campuses are already regulating the first amendment.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    sandman7925

    sandman7925

    Wealthy women wanted
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    27   0   0
    May 16, 2010
    3,559
    48
    False River
    All I’m saying is it’s going to happen. I’d bet everything I have that gun control is coming. Maybe not this year or the next but it will happen. And just like the electoral voting system a few highly populated areas shouldn’t make the decision for everyone. Baton Rouge and New Orleans can do what they want but the rest of the state should get to decide themselves. The sooner people have a more realistic conversation about it all the sooner it can be hashed out.
    You can repeat “from my cold dead constitutionally protected hands” all you want but it will not help.


    Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
     
    G

    Gladesman

    Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 21, 2017
    9
    1
    Rayville
    The reference to "militia" in the Second Amendment says that military weapons are specifically included within the bounds of this document. That cannot be argued. Anyone that says otherwise is ignoring the Constitution to promote their own agenda. No one seems to think when confronting these liberal judges.
     
    You must log in or register to reply here.

    Latest posts

    Staff online

    Members online

    ... and 14 more.
    Total: 300 (members: 64, guests: 236)

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    195,584
    Messages
    1,548,540
    Members
    29,262
    Latest member
    greywolf15
    Bear Creek Arsenal Ad
    Top Bottom