Gator 45/70
Well-Known Member
I heard from reliable sources that Jussie MAGA Smollett will be going door to door searching for the bump-stock's
Since he's 10feet tall and bullet proof.....
Since he's 10feet tall and bullet proof.....
I was referring to ones already manufactured.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That should tell us everything we need to know about what will soon happen. This is just a warm up. Officials will follow orders. It’s already happening and they are lined up to follow them. Don’t be foolish enough to say * that would never happen here*.
She makes some very real valid points.....
Don't be a chicken little. The sky isn't falling. The bumpstock thing is just pure response to the Vegas Shooting. While wrong, the sky isn't going to fall.
And yeah, Trump isn't really a pro-2A guy. Never was. Based on his history, I don't know why people are surprised at this. He's not going to go full Dianne Feinstein because he still needs his base of supporters who are in general Pro-2A.
She's a chicken little looking for youtube views.
You are right the sky isn’t falling but a major support to the roof has been cut in two and no one is rushing in to rebrace it. Pretty soon another jackass will come along a take out another column and before you know it the roof will get free familiar with the floor and trap you and I between them.
I do believe the pendulum is starting to swing the other way. The NRA is too busy making scare videos to generate funds from Pro-2A folks at the expense of pushing away the middle of the road non-gun owners or low number of gun owners who are wanting solutions enacted to prevent shootings like the Vegas one. Nothing is happening that actually helps. Instead of recruiting those middle of the road people to help, the NRA will push the other way.... then we will see real restrictions.
There is only one direction to push. The battle for Hamberger hill should be lesson enough to anyone from any walk of life to never give up hard fought ground, because you will die trying to retake it later.
So no tax stamp?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That was a battle. The fact we pushed away all the regular joes in Vietnam spelled our defeat.
Yeah, they did that in the 90’s with the first assault weapons ban. If a rifle or shotgun had any 2 of the listed parts it was a no-no. A folding stock and flash hider made it off limits, or something to that effect. We got past that one when the time ran out and it was not resumed. Same with magazines over 10 rounds. That law made the price of mags skyrocket. You could buy what was already produced but there could be no more over 10 rounds produced without the old ‘LAW ENFORCEMENT USE ONLY’ badge. I guess there are many of you that weren’t around or aware during the Bill Clinton/Janet Reno days, but let me tell you, **** got real. Those were the days that the NRA truly went to bat for us. Gosh damn I made a lot of money back then...I don't have a bumpstock, nor want one. But any item that goes on a firearm should be protected. What's to stop them from banning any other accessory that we use, like a scope, sling, bipod, silencer, or flash suppressor. They can make up any excuse to ban them. None are constitutionally protected, but as they say it is a slippery slope.
It should be protected because it does not violate any laws.
Are bump stocks constitutionally protected? What reason would he have for overturning it? I’m not a bump stock hater, I have family and friends that have them.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Are bump stocks constitutionally protected? What reason would he have for overturning it? I’m not a bump stock hater, I have family and friends that have them.
More so than the way it was banned (which was by Executive Order?) is that there was no offering of compensation for property. Give up your property at your expense or you’re a felon. Does this not go against another Constitutional amendment?My understanding is the suit is about the way it was banned. The BATF basically changed the definition of what a machine gun is. Congress passed into law the definition of how a machine gun works in the 1934 NFA and congress has to change it, not the BATF.
The stay only would have stopped the ban from applying to the person who filed the suit. The challenge to how the ban was instituted is on going.
More so than the way it was banned (which was by Executive Order?) is that there was no offering of compensation for property. Give up your property at your expense or you’re a felon. Does this not go against another Constitutional amendment?
Bumpstocks will likely go down in American history, known as the olive branch/consolation/sacrifice offered to the left in good faith, in hopes they’ll take the win and stfu....only problem is they’ll take it and still demand total disarmament, but we let them get their foot in the door.