Agreed had it not been for slavery in America our nation would not be the same and the blacks would ( what few survived ) be in Africa starving . How far do we take this ridiculous ploy? How about we research which Indians enslaved which Indians and give the ones who were enslaved the "entitlements " the enslavers are getting .
?I don’t think there is any guilt diatribe in his statement. It’s not about how western culture abused anyone. He’s simply saying if it’s fair to take from those ‘guilty’ of slavery why not redistribute the money alotted for Indian tribes to the ones who didn’t enslave other tribes. It’s a reasonable argument. If it’s ok to take from whitey to give to the ‘disadvantaged African American’ (threw up in my mouth a little) then surely it’s ok to take from the tribes who were slave masters to captured tribes. I’ll take it one step further. The black families who where slave owners (oh wait did I just burst some bubbles) should have a penalty on their 2019 1040 form, because it would have been especially wrong for an African to come here and enslave other Africans, right?Drop the guilt trip responses.
I’m quoting fact not indulging in a *you’re Guilty* diatribe.
Why is it that these types of conversations always devolve into this?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
