Join BayouShooter For Free
Brass

Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 23
  1. #11
    ESSAYONS

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Emperor View Post
    It obviously was searched thoroughly (74 page report says). You know what Ben Franklin said about a secret; Three can keep it, if two of them are dead! This was apparently a multitude of guys, going in and out of said list, and two of them spilled the beans on the others.

    I'm thinking this list would have been far better concealed, written on toilet paper, in a capsule, and lodged up one of their a**holes.
    From Military.com"
    "A search of the submarine's network failed to locate the lists on the drives. Kercher even Googled ways to search a network so he could find the lists himself, the report states.
    The Naval Criminal Investigative Service got involved but, after a "thorough forensic search of the submarine's computer networks and drives," they too were unable to locate the lists, said Cmdr. Sarah Self-Kyler, a spokeswoman for U.S. Submarine Forces."
    https://www.military.com/daily-news/...ate-women.html

    Unless the 74 page report stated something neither article mentioned, it would appear no a**holes were needed to hide the list. Either it's really well hidden or it was hidden good enough to not be found before it was able to be deleted. Like I said, someone with a little bit of computer knowledge could likely hide it with ease. So it appears you got the answer to your question about the intelligence of the men who thought the digital files wouldn't be found. They don't seem to be as dumb as you would like them to be.

  2. #12
    Seriously Misunderstood!

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by thperez1972 View Post
    From Military.com"
    "A search of the submarine's network failed to locate the lists on the drives. Kercher even Googled ways to search a network so he could find the lists himself, the report states.
    The Naval Criminal Investigative Service got involved but, after a "thorough forensic search of the submarine's computer networks and drives," they too were unable to locate the lists, said Cmdr. Sarah Self-Kyler, a spokeswoman for U.S. Submarine Forces."
    https://www.military.com/daily-news/...ate-women.html

    Unless the 74 page report stated something neither article mentioned, it would appear no a**holes were needed to hide the list. Either it's really well hidden or it was hidden good enough to not be found before it was able to be deleted. Like I said, someone with a little bit of computer knowledge could likely hide it with ease. So it appears you got the answer to your question about the intelligence of the men who thought the digital files wouldn't be found. They don't seem to be as dumb as you would like them to be.
    The 74-page investigative report reveals two lists — one with Yelplike star ratings on the women and another containing *lewd and sexist comments* beside each woman’s name, according to Military.com.
    So is this issue about the lists themselves and the demeaning of the women, or the lists being on the vessel's computers, or the cover up by the chain of command? I just read the article as posted here. If there is no physical evidence of "the lists", what are we talking about here?

    I am also considering the article's source.
    Remember; The 2nd Amendment Protects the 1st!
    Lyndon Johnson (Democrat & Father of US Welfare System) we'll give them stuff........."and have them ni&&ers voting democratic for the next 200 years!"
    "I'm a self reliant, self supported American trapped in a "Free Shit" society!"
    Be Warned! Amazon.com is Skynet!
    PLEASE STOP USING GOOGLE!
    I don't believe in a supreme deity; but have to believe Trump's win was Divine Intervention!

  3. #13
    Marksman

    Premium Member

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Bangswitch View Post
    On one hand itís lib-tards screaming women should be equal in every way including laws pertaining to nipple exposure (not opposed to this one myself). They claim women are as tough deserve equal pay and opportunity including serving in combat environments but then they canít handle something as childish as a screw list. If you canít handle something this childish how on earth could you handle being gangbanged next to a goat by a dozen Taliban fighters?
    Where do they keep the goats on the submarine?

    Mike
    ΦΒΚ. Honi soit qui mal y pense.

  4. #14
    ESSAYONS

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Emperor View Post
    So is this issue about the lists themselves and the demeaning of the women, or the lists being on the vessel's computers, or the cover up by the chain of command? I just read the article as posted here. If there is no physical evidence of "the lists", what are we talking about here?

    I am also considering the article's source.
    The article(s) mention a male printing out a list and giving a copy to a female (list with stars). He then printed out the other list (list with comments) and gave it to her. She took pictures and sent them to her boyfriend and other Navy personnel not on the boat because she felt like the officers on the boat may be trying to cover it up. When you get down to it, we know there's a list because there are pictures of it and possibly a copy of it but the original list from which the printouts were said to have originated was never found. If the male was giving the lists to the females, it would not be unreasonable to think he would cooperate with an investigation and would have shown someone where on the network the list was stored. Maybe he did or maybe he didn't. Maybe the original list got deleted or maybe it originated somewhere else and the "server" was used so he could help stop it without pointing a finger at a specific individual. A guy with marginal computer skills could have hid the list on the server and deleted it so an inexperienced computer user, perhaps one relying on Google, would not be able to find it. But it may take a little more computer knowledge to delete it so it won't show up in a forensic search. It's certainly possible but it takes a little more than emptying the trash can on the desktop.

    Being one of the sources is Military.com, I tend to give the information a little more weight.

    So it appears the issue I was addressing, the issue you initiated, was the intelligence of the guys on the sub for hiding the file on the network where it could be easily found.

  5. #15
    Marksman

    User Info Menu

    No woman should get in a boat that's full of Seamen. It had to be said.

    I will give you my Red Rider Carbine Action 200 Shot Range Model Air Rifle when you Pry it From My Cold Dead Hands
    Your Political Correctness is an Attack on my Free Speech

  6. #16
    Marksman

    User Info Menu

    Hahahaha.... This shit is just dumb... When i was on the KittyHawk, there was all kinds of dumb shit like this going on. Everyone knew. nobody cared. It was all fun and games... These guys need to be left alone to do their jobs. If a female wants to serve on a submarine in the Navy, thats great. But she needs realize that shit like this is gonna happen. She is afterall, surrounded by a bunch of hardlegs that have to go months on end sometimes without getting laid... Us Navy boys get horny. Lol....
    If you are so proud of where you're from that you fly your flag everywhere, please go back there. Your flag offends me! American lives Matter!

    Support LEO........
    Provide Backup!

  7. #17
    Marksman

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by RaleighReloader View Post
    Where do they keep the goats on the submarine?

    Mike
    In the Goat Locker of course.






    This was a great read
    http://www.ussarcherfish.com/afishpic/goat.htm

    another

    https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/checkpoint/wp/2015/05/01/how-this-seagoing-goat-found-itself-at-the-center-of-a-navy-investigation/?utm_term=.f45275426ea7


    It seems Navy has a long running tradition of screwing off.
    Last edited by Bangswitch; May 21st, 2019 at 08:12 AM.

  8. #18
    Marksman

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Spleen View Post
    Liked it so much I added it to my signature. Thanks Bangswitch!
    Thanks, as Limbaugh would say, just illustrating absurdity by being absurd.

  9. #19
    LEO

    User Info Menu

    What's really surprising, given that it's a bunch of sailors, is that the list was about females...

  10. #20
    Newbie

    User Info Menu

    Quote Originally Posted by Bangswitch View Post
    Agreed water is wet.

    For what itís worth the females Iíve come across that are/where military know what they were dealing with and more often than not were just as fifthy.

    On one hand itís lib-tards screaming women should be equal in every way including laws pertaining to nipple exposure (not opposed to this one myself). They claim women are as tough deserve equal pay and opportunity including serving in combat environments but then they canít handle something as childish as a screw list. If you canít handle something this childish how on earth could you handle being gangbanged next to a goat by a dozen Taliban fighters?
    I was in Izmir, Turkey back in 71-74 as a USAF pharmacy officer at a small hospital supporting a major NATO headquarter & logistics site. About mid tour for me, the Army contingent got in a company of WACS, young enlisted women. Prior to that the only female service women we had were a few of our commissioned nurses. Not long after those WAVES arrived our VD rate went out the roof.

    A couple of years later back in the states in a much larger regional hospital i had 4 young enlisted women as part of my pharmacy technician group. One was married, one dated and later married one of the male pharmacy technicians, the other two were single. All were ladies in every sense of the word.


    In that era i guess that was an indicator of the quality of the people the different services were taking in.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •