2020 Vette with Leno

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • Bangswitch

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 10, 2019
    2,221
    38
    a location near you
    Another break with tradition. I don’t know how I feel about a ‘mid-engine Corvette’ maybe it should be its own car in its own right and retire the monicker ‘Corvette’ it’s probably the best/baddest Vette ever designed but I’m just a little unsure if it’s really a ‘Vette.’

    But the Vette at inception was designed to compete with the Italian cars. With that in mind it’s a wonder we are just now seeing the change.

    I decided Vettes weren’t for me years ago when I set the seat as low as it would go and couldn’t get my noggin below the roof line.
     

    5star

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Oct 11, 2008
    319
    16
    West baton rouge
    Another break with tradition. I don’t know how I feel about a ‘mid-engine Corvette’ maybe it should be its own car in its own right and retire the monicker ‘Corvette’ it’s probably the best/baddest Vette ever designed but I’m just a little unsure if it’s really a ‘Vette.’

    But the Vette at inception was designed to compete with the Italian cars. With that in mind it’s a wonder we are just now seeing the change.

    I decided Vettes weren’t for me years ago when I set the seat as low as it would go and couldn’t get my noggin below the roof line.

    This!
     

    Danny Abear

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Aug 11, 2007
    1,444
    48
    Brusly, La.
    I had a vette for a short time,Didn't really like it so I sold it

    I had a 63 for about 6 months, sold it to a friend who ended up killing himself in it after he hit one of the oak trees that used to be in between the lanes on Hwy. 1; the only thing holding the front half to the rear half was the emergency brake cable
     

    Blackhawk

    Blackhawk
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Mar 3, 2008
    907
    28
    Pollock LA
    I had a vette in the garage continuously for 22 years, used as a daily driver. Reflections:

    1. They are not designed for being the "only" car. I always had to have a another vehicle on hand (usually but not always a pickup) to do the mundane choirs like hauling off the trash, transporting more than one passenger.
    2. Sports car suspension equals rough ride.
    3. Tires are really expensive and don't last long (like only 20k miles if using the ones designed for the car).
    4. T-Tops, moon roof, or convertible - doesn't matter, still leaks when it rains.
    5. A/C's never did cool properly, at least to the same level as other cars with an up front vertical radiator/condenser.
    6. They are expensive to operate, My experience (not counting fuel/oil, insurance, payments) over the last 11 years of ownership was around $2000/year.

    On the other hand, they are a blast to drive, power to spare, can pass anything on the road (except a gas station) and often turn heads. I'll stick with my pickup for now.

    YMMV
     

    RaleighReloader

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    32   0   0
    Jan 30, 2015
    1,177
    48
    Baton Rouge, LA
    I haven't owned a Vette, but I'm pretty squarely in their buying demographic, and I've owned other cars of that ilk.

    As Blackhawk correctly stated, this really can't be your only car (unless you only need a car for hauling yourself around and not carrying much home than two grocery bags from the store). And yes, my old 911 destroyed tires ... I was doing rear tires every 15,000 miles or so, at about $600 per pair. It was an expensive hobby ... like owning a boat, the best days in a sports car owner's life are the day he buys it and the day he sells it.

    That said, I think that this rear engined Corvette is amazing. The architecture of the Corvette has changed extensively over the years, and that hasn't diminished the badge one bit. Admittedly, there were good years and bad years and some of the generations aged better than others ... but I don't know that there's anything written in stone that says that the Corvette has to have a front engine. And stone breaks when it's hit hard enough ... so even if that was a "rule," it seems like a great time to break it.

    That said, I'll stick to my GMC Sierra with the 6.2 V8. I have over 400 horsepower on tap, I can seat five adults in comfort, and I can put all of my junk in the bed of the truck and still tow thousands of pounds. And, delightfully, I can still hit almost 25 MPG on the highway if I drive with a light foot.

    Mike
     

    machinedrummer

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Apr 5, 2010
    3,685
    113
    Kingwood, Tx
    I rarely see a 25-40 year old driving them around here. It’s mainly the 50-70 crowd with their trophy seat cover on the passenger seat. The car is the cheapest part of that deal. :D
     

    Bangswitch

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 10, 2019
    2,221
    38
    a location near you
    That said, I think that this rear engined Corvette is amazing. The architecture of the Corvette has changed extensively over the years, and that hasn't diminished the badge one bit. Admittedly, there were good years and bad years and some of the generations aged better than others ... but I don't know that there's anything written in stone that says that the Corvette has to have a front engine. And stone breaks when it's hit hard enough ... so even if that was a "rule," it seems like a great time to break it.

    Mike

    I agree, it’s certainly an excellent car in its own right and if I could fit, it would be on my wish list for Santa. The Corvette isn’t just a cool car, it’s a sum of 65 years of lineage. Those who are Corvette guys first and car guys second will be the ones who wail and nash their teeth. If the engineers would have made the switch when technology first made the mid-engine viable the tradition would have been to stay on the cutting edge, but 65 years of a front engine rwd 2door roadster exists. Honestly it’s of no consequence to me I’ll never own any of them front or rear engine, but I will always admire them as beautiful and I’m sure fun cars.
     

    Coyote5.0

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 4, 2016
    215
    18
    Prairieville
    Another break with tradition. I don’t know how I feel about a ‘mid-engine Corvette’ maybe it should be its own car in its own right and retire the monicker ‘Corvette’ it’s probably the best/baddest Vette ever designed but I’m just a little unsure if it’s really a ‘Vette.’

    But the Vette at inception was designed to compete with the Italian cars. With that in mind it’s a wonder we are just now seeing the change.

    I decided Vettes weren’t for me years ago when I set the seat as low as it would go and couldn’t get my noggin below the roof line.

    Everything evolves. Mustang live axle >>>IRS was controversial. I love the IRS on my stang. It handles curves much better than the live axle cars.
     

    340six

    -Global Mod-
    Staff member
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Apr 12, 2012
    6,499
    113
    Kenner, La
    Funny thing is ii have no interest in new Camaros Stangs or Challengers or the silly 4 door Charger. I would get nice old iron with that money. Toss fuel injection and an overdrive trans in it.
    If it had to be new or newer newer Vett or Viper no more so would have to be used mint one.
     

    KDerekT83

    Hobbyist
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Corvettes arent all they're cracked up to be. My toy is a damn Honda Civic, and I've found that unless its boosted, I usually dont waste my time racing them. Its more or less a supercar. I shouldnt be able to pull up on one and have to let off in 4th so he can catch up to me with a damn 4banger... Lol.
     
    Last edited:

    Bangswitch

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 10, 2019
    2,221
    38
    a location near you
    Everything evolves. Mustang live axle >>>IRS was controversial. I love the IRS on my stang. It handles curves much better than the live axle cars.

    I was never a Mustang guy but I had a 5th Gen Camaro and I wholeheartedly agree IRS in a sports car is not a dirty word. In curves the faster I pushed the better it handled. I made horseshoe turns at 50mph in that thing. And the mid-engine is a move forward in design. But this couldn’t be the first time the engineers for the Corvette said, ‘hey mid-engines handle better.’ It wasn’t an epiphany it was a decided break with tradition, I’m not crying in my beer over it, but that’s not a ‘Vette’ it’s a modern supercar. If I was 6 inches shorter and had 60-70k to blow it would be considered I’m sure.
     
    Last edited:

    Bangswitch

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 10, 2019
    2,221
    38
    a location near you
    It’s not a fair comparison but when GM bastardized the GTO name with an Australian retread and a big motor it wasn’t really a GTO.

    And Dodge did the same with the Charger. If the current incarnation of the Charger was made in the 70’s with 70’s tech it would be a souped up Diplomat.
     

    swampfoxx

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Jul 15, 2014
    726
    43
    Ponchatoula, LA
    I've had three, '84, '01, '03. The '84 was like a go cart, hard suspension and you could feel every pebble in the road, but you could also feel when it was going to drift and compensate for it. The '01 and '03 were like a fast Cadillac. They were fine cars, but the suspension was softer, and you could get into trouble before you could feel it. The '01 had a 6 speed manual and got 30+ MPG on the freeway in 6th gear. I had to sell them because I have a bad back and could no longer get out of them.

    BTW - There were several mid engine concept Corvettes: 1964 - CERV II, 1968 - Astro II, 1972 - Reynolds Aluminum Corvette, 1976 - Aerovette, 1986 - Corvette Indy, 1990 - CERV III, 1992 - Sting Ray III. Unfortunately, none were approved for production.
     

    RaleighReloader

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    32   0   0
    Jan 30, 2015
    1,177
    48
    Baton Rouge, LA
    It’s not a fair comparison but when GM bastardized the GTO name with an Australian retread and a big motor it wasn’t really a GTO.

    Actually, I'm not sure that what GM did with the GTO is all that different. The Holden platform was fantastic and that 6.0 went like a bat out of hell. People bot hot and bothered because it wasn't as "retro styled" as the old GTO's of yore, but it sure was a fun car to drive (at least, the two that I've driven were). And it wasn't as novel as the new Corvette, but I think they knew that the buying audience for the GTO was much smaller and it didn't warrant a full redesign.

    For whatever reason, it reminded me a bit of the Monte Carlo GTX: a sleeper car that would dust everyone at the grand prix du stoplight ...

    Mike
     

    Bangswitch

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    1   0   0
    Jan 10, 2019
    2,221
    38
    a location near you
    Actually, I'm not sure that what GM did with the GTO is all that different. The Holden platform was fantastic and that 6.0 went like a bat out of hell. People bot hot and bothered because it wasn't as "retro styled" as the old GTO's of yore, but it sure was a fun car to drive (at least, the two that I've driven were). And it wasn't as novel as the new Corvette, but I think they knew that the buying audience for the GTO was much smaller and it didn't warrant a full redesign.

    For whatever reason, it reminded me a bit of the Monte Carlo GTX: a sleeper car that would dust everyone at the grand prix du stoplight ...

    Mike

    It definitely wasn’t true to tradition of the GTO and I 100% agree it always reminded me of a Monte Carlo. I always felt like they took name with a built-in demographic and took a half decent platform and rebranded it a GTO. That’s not to say they never flopped on a GTO body style prior the the last incarnation either. But they were relying on the legend to sell automobiles that didn’t really fit.

    I know there is a bit of subjective judgment and bias, based on what I think a GTO should look like. I do suppose it’s actually pretty true to original form. The first gen GTO was actually a sport package of another car if memory serves me. Of course in my mind every GTO should resemble the second gen’s. God those cars were sweet.
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom