Yes, I meant reasonable suspicion and probable cause, mr editor...as you point out, I didn’t get the exact terminology which gave you a foothold in trying to disprove my point which is: they are not evidence that a crime has been committed. They are not stand alone evidence for a conviction. They are used to imply guilt but are not proof. When used alone they can either be shot down in court or leave room for reversal.
Nope that’s not how it works. That’s an ‘it’s only stealing if you get caught’ argument.
Thats not always the case either if someone is wearing a vest that says security and they are toting an AR I would be more concerned than if he had no marking and a cell phone cam. Private security that regularly carry AR’s aren’t your typical Paul Blart type. But my point was reasonable people will try to reason away why someone would have an AR and a vest in public. One result is fear/concern. It’s a highly probable result, but not the only conclusion a reasonable person may reach.
Kind of like me liking Ides of March might be because I like brass bands, not diddling children.
Reasonable people might think you train too much and have to many guns, and you should have them all taken away. I’m pretty sure no one here is that kind of reasonable.
Did you run over anyone? Also, Mad Dog 20/20 or Colt 45?
