Love me some twisted tea..

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • thperez1972

    ESSAYONS
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 28, 2015
    5,710
    113
    Baton Rouge, LA
    tj4fne0hjkcsjc1qaegu.jpeg


    - - - Updated - - -

    fc5l8ftg8p8v44ysf1pt.jpeg
     

    4-14

    treat never keep keep
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 24, 2012
    135
    18
    WBR
    Guys goes to the zoo. Sees a sign that says "Don't talk to the tigers". Talks to the tigers. The zookeeper lets the tiger out to attack the guy.

    That's a closer analogy.
    wrong, you brought in a 3rd party.

    Guy goes to zoo. Sees sign that says *Don’t antagonize the tiger.* Guy yells at the tiger and makes *tiger noises*. Tiger gets out, mauls guy.
     

    thperez1972

    ESSAYONS
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 28, 2015
    5,710
    113
    Baton Rouge, LA
    wrong, you brought in a 3rd party.

    Guy goes to zoo. Sees sign that says *Don’t antagonize the tiger.* Guy yells at the tiger and makes *tiger noises*. Tiger gets out, mauls guy.

    I did bring in a 3rd party because the first analogy had the direction backwards. The first analogy had the guy moving to the tiger when, in reality, it was the tiger who didn't like the words and attacked the guy for it. The 3rd party was added as the cage door needed to be opened. I felt it would be difficult for the tiger to use the keys without assistance due to the absence of opposable thumbs.

    But you're analogy makes sense. The guy who used words was attacked by a simplistic animal who isn't capable of rational thought and is controlled by their emotions.
     

    4-14

    treat never keep keep
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 24, 2012
    135
    18
    WBR
    I did bring in a 3rd party because the first analogy had the direction backwards. The first analogy had the guy moving to the tiger when, in reality, it was the tiger who didn't like the words and attacked the guy for it. The 3rd party was added as the cage door needed to be opened. I felt it would be difficult for the tiger to use the keys without assistance due to the absence of opposable thumbs.

    But you're analogy makes sense. The guy who used words was attacked by a simplistic animal who isn't capable of rational thought and is controlled by their emotions.
    Wrong again, what you consider rational is really just society pussifying the weak to not have consequences for overstepping their bounds of challenging the stronger...but want should we expect, I mean this is a topic on a gun forum in America.
     

    thperez1972

    ESSAYONS
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 28, 2015
    5,710
    113
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Wrong again, what you consider rational is really just society pussifying the weak to not have consequences for overstepping their bounds of challenging the stronger...but want should we expect, I mean this is a topic on a gun forum in America.

    Do you feel the appropriate reaction to hearing a word you don't like is hitting someone in the head with a metal can?
     

    Magdump

    Don’t troll me bro!
    Rating - 100%
    163   0   0
    Dec 31, 2013
    9,396
    113
    Hammond, Louisiana
    Or maybe... the guy kicking at him while he was picking up his tea was just the gesture he needed to justify smashing the guy in the teeth with that delicious canned beverage. It had to be the teeth that breached the can, right? Lol, Okay!
    No matter what, it’s more entertaining than most anything I’ve seen this month. This one will be around for a long time and reach epic status.
     
    Last edited:

    thperez1972

    ESSAYONS
    Staff member
    Gold Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    Dec 28, 2015
    5,710
    113
    Baton Rouge, LA
    Or maybe... the guy kicking at him while he was picking up his tea was just the gesture he needed to justify smashing the guy in the teeth with that delicious canned beverage. It had to be the teeth that breached the can, right? Lol, Okay!
    No matter what, it’s more entertaining than most anything I’ve seen this month. This one will be around for a long time and reach epic status.

    He tried to kick the can away. And the way the guy was holding the can, there could be quite a few reasons the can burst other than hitting the poet in the teeth. This won't reach epic status. It's already peaked.
     

    4-14

    treat never keep keep
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Jun 24, 2012
    135
    18
    WBR
    Do you feel the appropriate reaction to hearing a word you don't like is hitting someone in the head with a metal can?
    The law says it isn’t. So no...
    but did he deserve it? Yes
     

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    195,218
    Messages
    1,546,026
    Members
    29,168
    Latest member
    Lyle.lejeune2017
    Top Bottom