leadslinger972
*Banned*
So does anyone know if Nathan Hale is an attorney?
So does anyone know if Nathan Hale is an attorney?
So does anyone know if Nathan Hale is an attorney?
Somebody already beat you to that joke.
It's not a joke. It's a legitimate question. The dude pulled up some statutes that I couldn't inmediately find.
if Perez didn't have 1/3 the replies in this 120+ comment thread, we may have had a legitimate discussion going on.
It's not a joke. It's a legitimate question.
That's some funny stuff. My goal was to keep the discussion legitimate. If Hale is not a lawyer, the information he provided would have been taken "with a grain of salt" or dismissed all together. I wanted to legitimately discuss the information itself.
He referenced section O
http://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=97451
He referenced section A
http://www.legis.la.gov/Legis/Law.aspx?d=97860
That’s the problem, you feel the need to keep the discussion legitimate as you see fit. The original question I asked has absolutely nothing to do with you but you attempted to set me up for an argument. You failed miserably and now you are trying to give excuses. It’s not working.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Would you be satisfied if I told you he was?
That’s the problem, you feel the need to keep the discussion legitimate as you see fit. The original question I asked has absolutely nothing to do with you but you attempted to set me up for an argument. You failed miserably and now you are trying to give excuses. It’s not working.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
So does anyone know if Nathan Hale is an attorney?
Would you be satisfied if I told you he was?
I wasn't asking you.
I wasn't asking you.
What about Slidell? I don't think theirs has ended up in court yet.
https://library.municode.com/la/slidell/
Sec. 10-36. - Rules, regulations, and restrictions upon the possession of a firearm on property comprising of parks, playgrounds, recreational areas or facilities or buildings owned or operated by the city.
(a) It is unlawful for any employees, former employees, customers, and visitors, including individuals in possession of a statewide permit for concealed handguns, except law enforcement officers or properly qualified retired law enforcement officers, to bring a firearm(s) onto city premises. It shall be unlawful for any person to have in his possession a firearm, pellet gun, BB gun or other instrument/weapon customarily used or intended for probable use as a dangerous weapon on property comprising parks, playgrounds, recreational areas or facilities or buildings owned or operated by the city. Under the laws and regulations provided hereinabove, a person who legally possesses a firearm may secure the firearm in a case stored in a locked privately owned vehicle and/or hidden from plain view in that vehicle while entering and/or visiting property owned and administered by the city. (b) This section shall not apply to: (1) Any law enforcement officer in the performance of his official duties; (2) Historic weapons or reproduction historic weapons when used in accordance with the department of cultural arts; (3) Weapons kept in a case within a locked privately owned vehicle and/or hidden from plain view in that vehicle; (4) Instances where the mayor has granted special permission because the possession of a weapon(s) will be used in a manner that furthers the purposes and objectives of the city.
(Ord. No. 3841, 12-6-2016)
Thanks 340six...
I'm glad to know I got an infraction for breaking marketplace rules in this thread...
You and Perez should both get the boot.
Ok I clicked market place I am not perfect. Easy mistake! Since you want to put it out for anyone to see. The reason was the same no matter what.
The infraction was for. Rudeness or personal attacks - While we appreciate passionate and informed discussion we will not allow rudeness, insulting posts, personal attacks, purposeless inflammatory posts, or trolling. If you do not like a thread or do not have anything positive to say, do not post anything at all!