Agreed.Meh…. I’ve carried in most all of those places…. Conceal means concealed.
Agreed.Meh…. I’ve carried in most all of those places…. Conceal means concealed.
Meh…. I’ve carried in most all of those places…. Conceal means concealed.
see aboveBut there are no significant legal ramifications (in Louisiana) to completely ignoring the signs there...
On the other hand, carrying at a parade could land you with an illegal carrying of a weapon charge.
Winner, winner.
No, you get arrested for being caught carrying a concealed weapon a prohibited (by law) location.
Easy answer here:Then why even bother to get the CHP to begin with? Just CC like all the other criminals and thugs in LA. Why spend the time and $200 to even get the CHP if you willfully fail to follow the LSP rules? I mean we got @AustinBR and @thperez1972 both stating right here "no problem CC in businesses who prohibit CC in their public locations". Little recourse, you will be asked/instructed to leave if caught. Flagrant violation of the LSP rules as laid out in their booklet. Both know the businesses who ban CC in their locations but say "go ahead, no problem, see if you get caught". One a moderator here, and perez is a cop.
From the LSP rule book: "O. The provisions of Subsection N of this Section shall not limit the right of a property owner, lessee, or other lawful custodian to prohibit or restrict access of those persons possessing a concealed handgun pursuant to a permit issued under this Section. No individual to whom a concealed handgun permit is issued may carry such concealed handgun into the private residence of another without first receiving the consent of that person."
Anybody can download the LSP rulebook right here: https://www.lsp.org/services/concealed-handgun-information/laws-rules-and-duties/
I just don't get it, people here pick and choose which rules or laws they are going to either follow, ascribe to, or enforce. People of authority. I'd be willing to bet a few CHP permitees here carry in schools and other banned places too, other than the above mentioned businesses. They interpret the law (or violate it) as they see fit. Not all but a few no doubt.
Hopefully Landry will get CC for all citizens in Louisiana passed this year. Then we can all CC legally. Least those who are not prohibited by law, like probation, a domestic order, ect.
So you are saying the rules in the LSP CHP Handbook mean nothing? It clearly states the owners or lessees or other custodians of a business can post signs barring CC, and you are to respect that as a CHP holder.The presence of a sign on a private business does not make it illegal for you to carry a firearm there. The only recourse the business has is to simply ask you to leave and to trespass you from their property. You won't get a ticket. You won't go to jail. You didn't break the law. You just have to leave.
That is exactly what I'm saying. In some instances the LSP Handbook references laws on the book. But the whole "you are to respect business wishes" has as much legal force as "you are to respect your mother when in her home" (which, really, is true as your mom could totally trespass you from her house if you don't live there).So you are saying the rules in the LSP CHP Handbook mean nothing? It clearly states the owners or lessees or other custodians of a business can post signs barring CC, and you are to respect that as a CHP holder.
Then why even bother to get the CHP to begin with? Just CC like all the other criminals and thugs in LA. Why spend the time and $200 to even get the CHP if you willfully fail to follow the LSP rules? I mean we got @AustinBR and @thperez1972 both stating right here "no problem CC in businesses who prohibit CC in their public locations". Little recourse, you will be asked/instructed to leave if caught. Flagrant violation of the LSP rules as laid out in their booklet. Both know the businesses who ban CC in their locations but say "go ahead, no problem, see if you get caught". One a moderator here, and perez is a cop.
This isnt working together, the feds got the money and are not as worried about the elections and WINS>It's not uncommon for the DA and the Feds to work together. The DA may drop charges and the Feds will charge someone. It's also not uncommen for the Feds to step in if a DA won't pursue charges.
This isnt working together, the feds got the money and are not as worried about the elections and WINS>It's not uncommon for the DA and the Feds to work together. The DA may drop charges and the Feds will charge someone. It's also not uncommon for the Feds to step in if a DA won't pursue charges.
I actually am debating what you say, You indicate they work together.. They actually Don't in most cases.. the feds got the money from congress to fight the GUN violence and have the funds to do it.. plus they dont care about winning elections.. They hardly have a discussion with the local DA prior to anything.. its two separate investigations . Especially when it comes to someone already on paper, clearly they should be violated but DA chooses to ignore that .. The FEDS see a glock switch and want to chase it.. But there is not a conversation per se' that occurs..This isnt working together, the feds got the money and are not as worried about the elections and WINS>
I actually am debating what you say, You indicate they work together.. They actually Don't in most cases.. the feds got the money from congress to fight the GUN violence and have the funds to do it.. plus they dont care about winning elections.. They hardly have a discussion with the local DA prior to anything.. its two separate investigations . Especially when it comes to someone already on paper, clearly they should be violated but DA chooses to ignore that .. The FEDS see a glock switch and want to chase it.. But there is not a conversation per se' that occurs..
Pitiful to see so many 2A'ers using the Gifford terms "gun violence" and "shooter". Trained up like show dogs and too dumb to know it.
SO YOU LIKE BEING A POSSIBLE STATISTIC? AND NOT THE GOOD KIND.Pitiful to see so many 2A'ers using the Gifford terms "gun violence" and "shooter". Trained like show dogs ...and don't know it.
Are you trying to imply that there is no such thing as "gun violence" or "shooters?"
No such thing in my world because in my world nothing has changed with criminal actions or intentions. Not one single thing.
Just because you (obviously), your peers and the media they cower to have adopted connecting phrases from a powerful gun control lobby doesn't mean I will. I'll never use the terms "gun violence" or "shooter" because in conversational or journalistic context they serve but a singular purpose.
̶T̶r̶a̶n̶s̶ ̶?̶So what do you call a person who shoots?
That’s the second time you said that. Are you really just figuring out that some folks are going to carry a firearm regardless of the laws in place?@thperez1972 Ok, I get it, it is not a violation of LA law. But it is outlined in the LSP Handbook, which is written and supplied to give the CHP holder an outline of what is responsible behavior. And we can clearly see that several CHP holders here on BS do as they please. Their interpretation of right and wrong, and what is permissible, and what they feel they can get away with. I guarantee a few here on BS with a CHP CC wherever, even in the banned places like bars, polling places, schools, parades, ect.