Congress threatened with Martial Law!!

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • BlueOwl23

    Active Member
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Sep 22, 2008
    30
    6
    Big Easy
    Martial Law Will Be Declared If Banker Bill Not Passed In House

    Kurt Nimmo
    Infowars
    October 3, 2008




    In House debate on the banker “rescue” bill, Rep. Brad Sherman told his fellow Congress critters the government will declare martial law and the stock market will drop 3,000 points if the bill is not passed. “The panic-mongers were to the point of telling people the market would drop 3,000 points and there would be martial law,” said Sherman.

    Sherman’s comment was not in the same context as a comment issued by Rep. Michael Burgess earlier in the week. Burgess, who appeared on the Alex Jones Show, said Pelosi threatened to invoke House rule XIII(6)(a), described as “martial law,” intended to suspend normal procedures and safeguards and thus allowing the House leadership to operate in a more authoritarian fashion. Sherman, however, said martial law would be declared on Wall Street, not in the House.

    Rep. Sherman said the “exaggerated fear-mongering turned out not to be true” and the House “can draft a good bill,” regardless of the pressure put on representatives to pass the banker bailout bill.


    The bailout plan is not only “economic fascism,” as Richard Viguerie has correctly noted, designed to loot the U.S. Treasury and reorganize and further consolidate elite control over the economy, but it is also a brazen effort to impose a martial law and dictatorship. Paulson’s role as financial dictator, not answerable to Congress or the American people, fully compliments additional steps taken over the last few years.

    As former California congressman Dan Hamburg said earlier this year, the 2007 National Defense Authorization Act gives the executive the power to invoke martial law in case of “major public emergencies,” not limited to “a natural disaster, a disease outbreak, a terrorist attack,” but also “any other condition in which the President determines that domestic violence has occurred to the extent that state officials cannot maintain public order.” Obviously, a financial crash and ensuring social chaos of the sort now being implemented by the ruling elite would be characterized as a dire emergency and a near perfect excuse to impose martial law, a long standing goal of the elite.

    As well, the Military Commissions Act of 2006, codifying indefinite imprisonment of dissidents, and the National Security Presidential Directive 51, ensuring the “continuity of government” in the event of a “catastrophic emergency,” are tools the government will most assuredly use after the economy implodes, now a foregone conclusion according to many economists.

    Numerous Bilderberg pronouncements, dutifully reported here at Infowars and Prison Planet but ignored by the larger corporate media, reveal what the global elite have in mind for us — an engineered economic crash followed by a consolidation of wealth under fire sale conditions. In order to successfully accomplish this, the elite must impose martial law and “maintain public order,” that is to say force the public to accept their terms by military force.

    As the Army Times reported last month, a battle-hardened “homeland” brigade is now “going domestic” after spending time in Iraq. It appears this illegal deployment (under Posse Comitatus) is designed to respond to “public disorder” as the economy is deliberately and cynically dismantled at the behest of our rulers who are now investing in the Treasury and the executive, with the complicity of Congress, dictatorial powers heretofore unheard of in America.
     

    penguin

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Sep 12, 2006
    1,821
    36
    Slidell, LA / NOLA
    To clarify the bit misleading text of this thread, I will comment below:

    In House debate on the banker “rescue” bill, Rep. Brad Sherman told his fellow Congress critters the government will declare martial law and the stock market will drop 3,000 points if the bill is not passed. “The panic-mongers were to the point of telling people the market would drop 3,000 points and there would be martial law,” said Sherman.

    What he said was that many were told in private conversations that if the bill was not passed that the sky would fall, the stock market will drop 3,000 points and "even a few members were told that martial law would be declared" if the bill is not passed. Rep Sherman did not tell them that it WOULD be declared. He was stating what was told to him in private by unnamed persons to unnamed people.

    Sherman’s comment was not in the same context as a comment issued by Rep. Michael Burgess earlier in the week. Burgess, who appeared on the Alex Jones Show, said Pelosi threatened to invoke House rule XIII(6)(a), described as “martial law,” intended to suspend normal procedures and safeguards and thus allowing the House leadership to operate in a more authoritarian fashion.

    This is correct. It is 'house martial law' which has nothing to do with 'martial law' as we know it. Basically, it means that a bill is brought forward to vote very shortly after negotiations have been completed. It happens more than you know, but it is used on issues of great importance so they aren't stuck in committee forever. Here is an example of 'house martial law'.

    The rest of the text that I quoted was cut out as that was just fearmongering IMHO. A single rep, who alluded without stating who told him and what other parties were told is just as much fearmongering as someone who would state that we would be under martial law. I'm sorry, I thought this cut and paste was very misleading and didn't bring about the truth in what was said.
     

    GunAddict

    constitutionalist
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Feb 23, 2008
    654
    16
    North Monroe, La. area
    To clarify the bit misleading text of this thread, I will comment below:



    What he said was that many were told in private conversations that if the bill was not passed that the sky would fall, the stock market will drop 3,000 points and "even a few members were told that martial law would be declared" if the bill is not passed. Rep Sherman did not tell them that it WOULD be declared. He was stating what was told to him in private by unnamed persons to unnamed people.



    This is correct. It is 'house martial law' which has nothing to do with 'martial law' as we know it. Basically, it means that a bill is brought forward to vote very shortly after negotiations have been completed. It happens more than you know, but it is used on issues of great importance so they aren't stuck in committee forever. Here is an example of 'house martial law'.

    The rest of the text that I quoted was cut out as that was just fearmongering IMHO. A single rep, who alluded without stating who told him and what other parties were told is just as much fearmongering as someone who would state that we would be under martial law. I'm sorry, I thought this cut and paste was very misleading and didn't bring about the truth in what was said.




    Actually it was exactly as said. Earlier comments from Rep. Burgess was talking about martial law in the house, but,, the recent comments by Rep. Sherman was talking about martial law declared on America due to an economic crisis. Under new law The Pres. can declare martial law if things get extremely bad economic wise, which they believe would happen if the bailout did not pass. Rep Sherman was on with Alex Jones just a little bit ago talking about it. Ron Paul is on with him right now discussing the passed bail out.
     
    Last edited:

    penguin

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Sep 12, 2006
    1,821
    36
    Slidell, LA / NOLA
    Actually it was exactly as said. Earlier comments from Rep. Burgess was talking about martial law in the house, but,, the recent comments by Rep. Sherman was talking about martial law declared on America due to an economic crisis. Under new law The Pres. can declare martial law if things get extremely bad economic wise, which they believe would happen if the bailout did not pass. Rep Sherman was on with Alex Jones just a little bit ago talking about it. Ron Paul is on with him right now discussing the passed bail out.


    I was going by his video and quoted him. He said that unknown persons talked to him about it. But again, I believe that the unknown persons who mentioned it to him to be fearmongering as much as it is for someone to claim that it is the truth.
     

    Swampy

    Chicken head
    Rating - 100%
    6   0   0
    Nov 3, 2006
    983
    16
    Harvey, La.
    How about the fear mongering ...Saying our entire economic system would be ruined if the bailout wasnt passed.. Wallstreet lost millions one day.. Oil went down the next.. I got cheaper prices at the pump a day later.. I didnt suffer any catostrophic losses or die of starvation... I dont think we needed the bailout it is only going to keep CEO's making millions and now create yet another government agency ..All so that people that couldnt afford houses in the first place can stay in the houses they cant afford...

    Perfect....:(
     

    posse comatosis

    Hoo-ahh!
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 15, 2008
    1,475
    36
    Bayou Perdition
    Dumb asses. The Dow is going to fall 3,000 points or more in the coming market correction. It will, as Warren Bufffet indicated, be long and protracted. And painful. The financial iceburg is just now showing it's melting ******* in a global meltdown.
     

    jimdana1942

    oldtimer
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Aug 11, 2008
    5,815
    38
    Sulphur, La.
    A form of martial law was declared and tested in Louisiana after hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav, and Ike. It greatly rerstricted one's movements and freedoms. The sad thing is it worked by arrests and putting fear of arrest in the general populace.

    And after Katrina they tested their police powers by confiscating guns en masse.
     

    Manimal

    Get'n Duffy!
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    May 27, 2007
    3,384
    113
    Louisiana
    A form of martial law was declared and tested in Louisiana after hurricanes Katrina, Rita, Gustav, and Ike. It greatly rerstricted one's movements and freedoms. The sad thing is it worked by arrests and putting fear of arrest in the general populace.

    And after Katrina they tested their police powers by confiscating guns en masse.

    +1 I was afraid of being arrested so I was limited as to how much family I could help, it kinda pissed me off.

    As mentioned earlier, 2 forms of 'Martial Law' were discussed and used as fear tactics, congressional and traditional.

    Clearly it worked.
     
    Top Bottom