1000' rule?
- Thread starter Muddy45
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
MSU Longshot
Left Handed Hammer
we have a bow shop right across the street from campus that carry's a few guns. I may be use and discharge within 1000'
Last edited:
Nolacopusmc
*Banned*
That will depend on local zoning ordnances.
It's private property, it's considered an extension of your car ... ( smile here )
There is a gun shop and firing range across the street from a high school in Lake Charles
We carry in ande out legaly ( even before the lift of the stupid 1000 ft rule
There is a gun shop and firing range across the street from a high school in Lake Charles
We carry in ande out legaly ( even before the lift of the stupid 1000 ft rule
Guate_shooter
LA CHP Instructor # 522
That will depend on the parish ordinances, since it changes from parish to parish, just like the restrictions and requirements to setup a shooting range they are not the same in Lafayette Parish as they are in St. Martin Parish for example.
Or 1000' from the public road and 1 1/2 mile from a church to shoot in your own property kinna thing.
Or 1000' from the public road and 1 1/2 mile from a church to shoot in your own property kinna thing.
Personally I have a problem with anyone telling somebody what they can do on their own property. If I own it, I should be able to do as I want.
Guate_shooter
LA CHP Instructor # 522
I understand, but I dont work for the Government, the Parish or make the rules I was just answering the question.
So you don't have any problem with the mosque they are building in New York next to ground zero?
Not anymore than if it was a christian church.
I posed the question to raise the issue of property rights, not to start a religious discussion.
My point is that most people accept limitations to their property rights, just as we do for personal rights; those legitimate limitations usually involve the greater good, or where unlimited exercise of your rights negatively affect the rights of others.
