I need to qualify something first. I am an uncompromising advocate for the Second Amendment, I just don't think the anti-gun crowd are honest negotiators. They are not interested in "reasonable gun control" or "gun safety." Their end game is an outright ban. With every shooting, they clamor for more and more so called "reasonable" restrictions and if unchecked will incrementally result in no more Second Amendment rights. Their tactic is kinda like water eroding a boulder. It will take a long time, but eventually the water will win and there will be no boulder. Thus, I am in the "no compromise" crowd on gun control.
However, when it comes to the so called "bump stock" that allows a semiauto rifle to fire in a simulated full-auto mode; I am willing to support a ban on that device. I had always thought they were of questionable legality. I find it ironic that the Obama administration ruled them legal in the first place. IMHO.
However, when it comes to the so called "bump stock" that allows a semiauto rifle to fire in a simulated full-auto mode; I am willing to support a ban on that device. I had always thought they were of questionable legality. I find it ironic that the Obama administration ruled them legal in the first place. IMHO.
Last edited: