Senators Voting for UN Gun Ban

[Lokin4AReason]

Tea Party Army®
2360 Corporate Circle, Suite 400
Henderson, Nevada 89074
800-362-2723 Int'l +1 702-475-3848 Webmaster@TeaPartyArmy.Com
HTTPS://TeatPartyArmy.Com Twitter: @TeaPartyArmy

06/09/2014

Dear Fellow Patriot,
U.N. Resolution 2117 lists 21 points dealing with firearms control, but perhaps of most interest is point number 11.

It: "CALLS FOR MEMBER STATES TO SUPPORT WEAPONS COLLECTION and DISARMAMENT of all UN countries".


By a 53-46 vote - The U.S. Senate voted against the U.N. resolution. HOORAY.


Now, Which 46 Senators Voted to Destroy Us?

Well, let their names become known !

See the complete list below.

If you vote in one of the states listed with these 46 "legis..traitors"… vote against them.


In the 53-46 vote, the Senate narrowly passed a measure that will actually stop the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

The Statement of Purpose from the Senate Bill reads:

Image of Charles Benninghoff, Founder
Charles Benninghoff, Founder


"To uphold Second Amendment rights and prevent the United States from entering into the United Nations Arms Trade Treaty."

The U.N. Small Arms Treaty, which has been championed by the Obama Administration, would have effectively placed a global ban on the import and export of small firearms.

The UN ban would have affected all private gun owners in the U.S. and had language that would have implemented an international gun registry, now get this, on all private guns and ammo.

Ronald Reagan said that we are but one generation away from losing our freedoms if we give up the fight. The fight is long, it is expensive but we will be the losers if we don't fight back against islamo-fascists like Barack Obama.

Here are the names of those senators who voted FOR the UN gun grab treaty:

Baldwin (D-WI)
Baucus (D-MT)
Bennett (D-CO)
Blumenthal (D-CT)
Boxer (D-CA)
Brown (D-OH)
Cantwell (D-WA)
Cardin (D-MD)
Carper (D-DE)
Casey (D-PA)
Coons (D-DE)
Cowan (D-MA)
Durbin (D-IL)
Feinstein (D-CA)
Franken (D-MN)
Gillibrand (D-NY)
Harkin (D-IA)
Hirono (D-HI)
Johnson (D-SD)
Kaine (D-VA)
King (I-ME)
Klobuchar (D-MN)
Landrieu (D-LA)
Leahy (D-VT)
Levin (D-MI)
McCaskill (D-MO)
Menendez (D-NJ)
Merkley (D-OR)
Mikulski (D-MD)
Murphy (D-CT)
Murray (D-WA)
Nelson (D-FL)
Reed (D-RI)
Reid (D-NV)
Rockefeller (D-WV)
Sanders (I-VT)
Schatz (D-HI)
Schumer (D-NY)
Shaheen (D-NH)
Stabenow (D-MI)
Udall (D-CO)
Udall (D-NM)
Warner (D-VA)
Warren (D-MA)
Whitehouse (D-RI)
Wyden (D-OR)

These Senators voted to let the UN take YOUR guns. These traitors need to lose their next election. We have been betrayed.

46 Senators Voted to Give your 2nd Amendment Constitutional Rights to the U.N.

 

[Jack]

Part of the actual text from the 2117...

Reaffirming the sovereign right of any State to regulate and control conventional arms exclusively within its territory, pursuant to its own legal or constitutional system

This whole thing is a perfect example of how the media pushes people's opinions, misleads them, and it isn't just the liberal side of the media doing it.

http://www.un.org/disarmament/ATT/docs/Draft_ATT_text_27_Mar_2013-E.pdf

 

[JR1572]

This again?

Can we have this merged with the thread that consists of all the other UN gun ban threads?

Oh no! The sky is falling again!

JR1572

 

[oleheat]

Even if the U.N. devised some diabolical plan to come in and disarm us, my money would be on them f**king it up, anyway....

 

[Ritten]

This again?

Can we have this merged with the thread that consists of all the other UN gun ban threads?

Oh no! The sky is falling again!

JR1572

+17 - One for each time this crap has been reposted!! We've got it, the UN is bad and we have idiots in Congress. At least the OP got one thing right and posted it in "off topic" cause this sure isn't "current events".

http://www.bayoushooter.com/forums/...reloading-treaty-threads&highlight=un+gun+ban

 

[JR1572]

+17 - One for each time this crap has been reposted!! We've got it, the UN is bad and we have idiots in Congress. At least the OP got one thing right and posted it in "off topic" cause this sure isn't "current events".

Really, how many times do we have to hear about this? Can someone sticky this at the top of a section so we don't have to hear about it anymore?

JR1572

 

[Emperor]

Part of the actual text from the 2117...



This whole thing is a perfect example of how the media pushes people's opinions, misleads them, and it isn't just the liberal side of the media doing it.

http://www.un.org/disarmament/ATT/docs/Draft_ATT_text_27_Mar_2013-E.pdf

Yes! This is correct! However, the bigger picture in regards to this particular subject is, why do these democrats go along lockstep with ANY cockamamie schemes regardless? Am I to believe that NOT A SINGLE republican saw the innocuousness in this vote? Not one?

NO republican said; "Meh, this vote doesn't mean ****; I'll go along since it's just feel good crap."

That to me, is more interesting and more telling than the proposal itself.

 

[Emperor]

This again?

Can we have this merged with the thread that consists of all the other UN gun ban threads?

Oh no! The sky is falling again!

JR1572

+17 - One for each time this crap has been reposted!! We've got it, the UN is bad and we have idiots in Congress. At least the OP got one thing right and posted it in "off topic" cause this sure isn't "current events".

http://www.bayoushooter.com/forums/...reloading-treaty-threads&highlight=un+gun+ban

And yes, this subject has run it's course on here.

 

[JR1572]

And yes, this subject has run it's course on here.

I'm glad we can look across the aisle at each other and agree on this.

JR1572

 

[Emperor]

I'm glad we can look across the aisle at each other and agree on this.

JR1572

If you and I are on opposite sides of ANY aisle, this country is really f**ked!

 

[Jack]

Yes! This is correct! However, the bigger picture in regards to this particular subject is, why do these democrats go along lockstep with ANY cockamamie schemes regardless? Am I to believe that NOT A SINGLE republican saw the innocuousness in this vote? Not one?

NO republican said; "Meh, this vote doesn't mean ****; I'll go along since it's just feel good crap."

That to me, is more interesting and more telling than the proposal itself.

I think the votes were more along the lines of dems voting for pointless feel good ******** and the republicans against something because they(rightfully) believe their uninformed constiuancy would think they were voting for a UN gun ban.

 

[JR1572]

If you and I are on opposite sides of ANY aisle, this country is really f**ked!

Good point!

JR1572

 

[Emperor]

I think the votes were more along the lines of dems voting for pointless feel good ******** and the republicans against something because they(rightfully) believe their uninformed constiuancy would think they were voting for a UN gun ban.

Which is why that is a larger problem! For me, anyway. It is very sad that so called leaders are basing their leadership on the level of ignorance of their constituency. Is it any wonder they get away with the crap they do.

If there were a written test in this country based on an individuals understanding of the world, and that test was to determine how many votes an individual voter would have over less informed, less engaged dummies; I would cancel out the entire population of Kansas.

 

[Jack]

Which is why that is a larger problem! For me, anyway. It is very sad that so called leaders are basing their leadership on the level of ignorance of their constituency. Is it any wonder they get away with the crap they do.

If there were a written test in this country based on an individuals understanding of the world, and that test was to determine how many votes an individual voter would have over less informed, less engaged dummies; I would cancel out the entire population of Kansas.

Ah humility