General consensus is of course they can own. COmpletely my fault, but I was looking more for feelings about their use.
Of course they can shoot with assistance, aids, and in controlled environments. How do you feel about someone with no eyes being armed next to you and the possible issues that could entail if they decided to start shooting in a public setting in what they perceived as a legit SD situation.
That's an important distinction. I was reading this all along with the perspective of the original post. Blind guy shooting himself and being burglarized. That could happen to anyone blind or not so I didn't see why they should be treated differently.
I have no problem with them owning guns or using them with assistance for hunting, target shooting, etc. Or in home defense (to me that would qualify as a "controlled environment"). Using a gun for defense out in public though, I think a good argument could be made for not allowing them to use them in that manner. Without any way to assertain what's behind their target it's just a matter of luck as to whether or not they hit unintended targets. I would think a taser or something like that wold be a much better defense weapon for the blind in public than a gun.