Right ....I don't know what I'm talking about. And apparently I can't manage to remember the dictum about wrestling with pigs.
Maybe you can tell me the part I have wrong:
An acknowledged Obama supporter, who is an outspoken supporter of the ACLU and its so-called first amendment "free speech" policies, takes exception to a campaign-related message on a sign owned by a private businessman. The free speech supporter takes it upon himself to contact the home office of the company whose products are sold by the independent agent and tattle about the message that disparages his preferred candidate.
The tattle tale's admits that he was motivated by his being a supporter of Obama, but offers as a rationale the fact that "is anal about statistics" (though statistics weren't quoted in the campaign-related message which so grievously offended him). He then adds that his tattling is "just doing his civic duty" (even though the accuracy of the sign's message had already been addressed by Snopes).
The more I think about it, Penguin is right .... and I'm completely wrong about the State Farm sign. Silly ole me. I thought it was a humorous poke at a political candidate. I think I'll contact Kentucky Fried Chicken and complain about the "Hillary Special - Two Small Breasts and a Fat Thigh" sign.
Or did you beat me to it ?
