I watched Anatomy of a Murder and it raised an interesting question:
Would successful use of a temporary insanity defense constitute being "adjudicated mentally defective" and bar the person from buying a gun?
Make sure I get all of your guns when you're banned from owning them. They'll have a good home-- I promise.
It is an interesting question-- and I'm sure Emperor's assessment is accurate. However, from what I understand, temporary insanity is related to an extreme emotional response-- presumably one that might overcome anyone in a similar situation. Seems like a pretty tenuous way to term someone "insane" for the purpose of denying them gun ownership. (That is of course provided my understanding is accurate-- I'm certainly not a legal guru.)
Yes, what I was wondering is whether successfully using the defense in a trial equals actually being "adjudicated", as in a civil proceeding to determine competence.