So I just went to my local Circle K to buy a can of tobacco, and what do I see above the check-out counter? Why, a banner reading the following:
I have a couple of questions and a few gripes about this.
Where does the Fed get off for increasing prices on certain types of goods to fund a specific cause? Who are these children who get federal health insurance? I for one have never benefited from such a program. Could this possibly be children of "low-income" families?
It's not so much about the money (there has always been a "sin tax" on cigarettes, alcohol, and gambling houses) as much as I am with where the proceeds are going.
It always gave me the case of the flaming red-ass that I never got a free-lunch and my parents car-pooled to work in the family Stanza, while Tyrone Brown had a book of lunch tickets and went home to his government subsidized house with a Caddy and a Lincoln in the driveway.
In my mind's eye, this is an unconstitutional tax targeting a specific demographic to benefit another demographic. Whatever happened to the catalyst of the American succession and the Civil War: "No taxation without representation"?
I'm really liking the idea on www.reteaparty.com to send tea-bags to Capitol Hill. Anyone with me?
According to the Federal Government, a $1.01 price increase will take effect on April 1, 2009. These funds will go benefit Children's Health Insurance.
I have a couple of questions and a few gripes about this.
Where does the Fed get off for increasing prices on certain types of goods to fund a specific cause? Who are these children who get federal health insurance? I for one have never benefited from such a program. Could this possibly be children of "low-income" families?
It's not so much about the money (there has always been a "sin tax" on cigarettes, alcohol, and gambling houses) as much as I am with where the proceeds are going.
It always gave me the case of the flaming red-ass that I never got a free-lunch and my parents car-pooled to work in the family Stanza, while Tyrone Brown had a book of lunch tickets and went home to his government subsidized house with a Caddy and a Lincoln in the driveway.
In my mind's eye, this is an unconstitutional tax targeting a specific demographic to benefit another demographic. Whatever happened to the catalyst of the American succession and the Civil War: "No taxation without representation"?
I'm really liking the idea on www.reteaparty.com to send tea-bags to Capitol Hill. Anyone with me?