Would it be insurance fraud if he was trying to make a claim for a crash he had before he was insured?
Yep. And if he falsified the paperwork regarding the crash to the insurance company, he would be liable to be charged.
Would it be insurance fraud if he was trying to make a claim for a crash he had before he was insured?
Your insurance company should file suit against that person and may do just that to recover their money. You still have your deductible though.
Before taking insurance advice from anyone, I would validate their expertise on the topic.
I'm almost in the same boat as you. Someone hit my daughters car on LSUA campus and she got a campus police report. Called their insurance company and the driver(child) was not on the owners policy(parents) so they will not pay for damages. Now I'm out $500 and will wait to see if my insurance can collect the money back. Forwarded their insurance company letter to the campus police and they said they will keep an eye out for the car, not sure if they will ticket or not.
If other driver says "do we really need to call the police?", a solid answer is "dang I already called"
What would they ticket him for?
Officers are often unwilling to write a full police report or ticket on private property. Try to get at least a incident report filed though.
Whether or not a state crash form is completed or just an in-house report depends upon the agency policy.
I would go after the repair shop - they had exclusive control of the vehicle and it was damaged while in their care. The repair shop gets to go after the guy who ran into it.
Absolutely correct. The car was still in the "care, custody and control" of the business.It is a bit late now and the OP is not clear but the way I read it the OP gave the vehicle to the shop to fix. In doing so there was a bailment created. Now the shop may say they are not responsible for loss theft or damage but that is not always the case. In this instance the damage was done while the vehicle was in the possession of the repair facility. They have a duty to exercise normal and reasonable care of the vehicle up to the point where the vehicle put back in control of the owner. Typically putting the keys in the person's hand signifies control of the vehicle.
So what the OP (and others in the future) should have done instead of accepting the problem is to pull the business into the matter since they typically have some liability. Call the police and get the business owner's insurance information also.
Absolutely correct. The car was still in the "care, custody and control" of the business.