AmenLord help our Country!
AmenLord help our Country!
Proper English?Idk, I thought it was pretty clearly stated, but even though the British speak English, it is a different form of English.
At least you finally admit thats your purpose here.No way, then I would be able to stir ****.
A lot of people on this forum are at least typing the (Queen's) King's English. And it's happening a lot more often. If you were a POME, I'd cut you some slack. I think most people here are should know better. But, I'm seeing it everywhere!!Idk, I thought it was pretty clearly stated, but even though the British speak English, it is a different form of English.
If it were only that clear. It’s just not.You two are something else.
We can argue that the 2A has been "infringed" by plenty of laws that have stood the test of time and multiple courts, including the supreme court. There are also many gun laws that 2A supporters support. An easy one is violent felons not having access to firearms.
Years ago, laws were passed that made rifles with <16" barrels classified as "short-barreled rifles." Folks found a loophole by attaching a brace to them and calling them a "braced pistol"...that just so happens to shoot a rifle round. The writing was on the wall that it would be classified as a SBR at some point. So yes, I'll call it a loophole because an AR with a 12 inch barrel is not a pistol.
I've also mentioned that I think the NFA laws are pretty dumb. Suppressors and SBRs should be much easier to get for the everyday responsible gun owner. But they're not. Maybe go protest that instead of wasting your time telling other clear supporters of the 2A and general firearm rights to "move to the UK."
It's not a loophole to provide a product that complies with the law. And a lot of people refer to magazines as clips. That doesn't somehow transform a magazine into a clip.No red coat here, but I've always thought of it as a loop hole and hell illegal. I was a VERY late adopter to the brace as I had many SBR's. Only reason I have a brace was b/c my scorpion and mpx came with it. And this was well after they were widely used as a work around for avoiding SBR tax stamp. And let's be honest, regardless if you think the NFA should exist or not. If you bought a brace, it was to get around that. The response is always, it shouldn't be illegal anyway. Well that doesn't hold up. It is illegal, the intention was to have a rifle with a short barrel, 99% of the people I met called their "pistols" rifles.
Dude… look what I found. And they got ‘em in tactical black.I seen this the other day on the interweb is a tennis ball considered a brace?
View attachment 136840
Some kind of CZ perversion?It can't be a stock or brace because it's already classified as a pistol. So a pistol on a pistol.
View attachment 136844View attachment 136845
We don’t agree with the law, but will follow it and force you to do the same. Laughable
Uhhhh maybe this one too lolAt least the board doesnt have this going on...
Classified Listings Archive - Louisiana Sportsman
app.louisianasportsman.com
That's gotta be a trap....At least the board doesnt have this going on...
Classified Listings Archive - Louisiana Sportsman
app.louisianasportsman.com
People can have different opinions. It doesn't mean one side is slipping. I choose to side with the law as enforced.If it were only that clear. It’s just not.
I’m something else? You mean besides on the fence about my 2A rights? Sorry bud, I just don’t buy into your complacency in this case. I’ve met very few gun owners in my life with the attitude of just letting the government take that inch because it doesn’t directly affect them. Now I’m in a concentrated group of gun owners and I’m seeing how prevalent the theme is and I find it disturbing to say the least.
I hate to say it, but since you went down that loophole road, what I’m reading here seems hypocritical at best.
Let me be clear, I completely respect the decision of the site in this matter. I never said I didn’t and I don’t think my comments allude to such. I completely understand having to do the right thing to protect interests. So far, I’ve only seen one opposed. So understand that the opposition is to your comment. Let’s not drag the site into it. Although I did not quote you or call you out over your comment, it’s exactly the sort of language I find so disturbing to hear from anyone claiming to be pro gun. Notice that I also didn’t bash you over it, nor am I now. Just voicing my plea for people to realize where we are headed. You’re slipping bro. Argue and defend all you want. You’re slipping. I just hope you fall on the right side of the fence.
I don't care if you or anyone doesn't follow the law, just as I don't care if you or others drive down I10 at 100 miles per hour. It is 100% your prerogative if you choose to break the law.We don’t agree with the law, but will follow it and force you to do the same. Laughable