Anty 506 in the news again. UPDATE on post 93
- Thread starter charlie12
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
Remember its MEM saying that, not the court. Plus, I bet the recording has the transaction discused which shows the intent he had to conduct a drug deal.
You do not need to have drugs to have the criminal intent to purchase them, which is a crime in and of itself. If that were the case, all the people arrested and convicted of "reverse buys" would walk free.
Lets not forget all the dumbass posting that he did about the case on OCDO and here. You bet they have subpeonea's for those posts. INtent will be easy to prove.
My prediction, he will be convicted, he will go to jail. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
You do not need to have drugs to have the criminal intent to purchase them, which is a crime in and of itself. If that were the case, all the people arrested and convicted of "reverse buys" would walk free.
Lets not forget all the dumbass posting that he did about the case on OCDO and here. You bet they have subpeonea's for those posts. INtent will be easy to prove.
My prediction, he will be convicted, he will go to jail. Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.
Last edited:
posse comatosis
Hoo-ahh!
Anty did not use his weapon in furtherance of a drug deal. He didn't pull it out until a real threat was presented. I have to agree with MEM. An armed robber got wasted, that's all there is to it. The FBI has said you can kill 'em as a justifiable homicide. WTF is with the DA and his pious attitude? Never been off the golf course? Up for reelection? Related case here handed down the other day in federal appeals court.
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/26/09-30266.pdf
http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2011/01/26/09-30266.pdf
Amen, Gives me another reason to stay out of Hammond. (not that i needed one)
YOu agree with MEM??? NOOOOO.
DId you read the citation you posted? Even though it deals with a totally different issue, possession of a firearm, not a self defense killing, the Fed court Affirmed the lower courts ruling and Upheld the conviction. Even if it did apply it does not help anty's case.
OOO My bad i Just saw Hammond every other sentance so I figured it was in Hammond.
You've been on this forum long enough to know the answer to that. And stop feeding the troll.
You are aware the man killed was in HIS OWN house right?
Specularius
Well-Known Member
From the quotes on the article:
WTF does that have to do with instance? There was only ONE shot fired. Period. End of story. MAGAZINE capacity has absolutley nothing to do with this incident. It could have been a single shot deringer and it would still have the same outcome!
WTF does that have to do with instance? There was only ONE shot fired. Period. End of story. MAGAZINE capacity has absolutley nothing to do with this incident. It could have been a single shot deringer and it would still have the same outcome!
Specularius
Well-Known Member
Maybe so but there are thousands of FUDS out there that try to use things like that to further their anti message. We do not need to be giving the Anti's any ammunition!
