Did you actually read that blog? According to them, Reagen signed twice as many Executive Orders as Obama has so far.
The big problem is that 40 years have elapsed since the Nixon Watergate trials. America is a different place that has fallen for the Siren's song of free stuff, just vote for me and I'll take care of you, etc. From what I've seen in The Dear Leader's first term, sheeple don't give a damn about what he does so long as there's beer in the fridge, porn on the computer, a football game on, and their little bubble of exixtence doesn't get interfered with.
Fed LE will salute and march forward on any illegal Executive Orders. There will be a small minority that may protest (they'll be fired or brow beaten into line), but most will press on.
Love it or hate it The American Republic has proven throughout its entire exsistance to have resiliency that far out last its flaws. Issues much larger and more toxic than Gun Bans have threatened this country to include; Slavery, Social Security, Prohibition, westward Expansion, and Civil Rights. Our unique form of Democracy is UGLY but it has proven time and time and time again to work.
Everything you guys are saying about Obama was said about Madison, both Roosevelt's, and Reagan. Until an overwhelming majority of American Voters agree with Feinstein they can be out maneuvered. Once that majority arrives.... It's time to move.
How many Federal LEO do you know?
I've met a few, and they are pretty simple minded.. They will follow blindly, not all, but enough will..
You have far too much faith.
Rome absolutely, positively never fell, UNTIL IT FELL. (It only took one man, Julius Caesar, to end the Republic. And he did it illegally)
How many Feds are there? 100,000? How many do you know, 50-60 thousand? Are you intimating that many would not follow illegal orders?
*whistle blows*millions of jews thought illegal orders wouldn't be carried out, as they got ready for their shower.
*whistle blows*
godwin's law
ball reverted to gorilla's 15 yard line, still 2nd down.
Although in one of its early forms Godwin's law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[SUP][4][/SUP] the law is now often applied to any threaded online discussion, such as forums, chat rooms and blog comment threads, and has been invoked for the inappropriate use of Nazi analogies in articles or speeches.[SUP][5][/SUP]
Well Leo since its a done deal I hope you packed some food in a backpack and are ready to resist.
Godwin's law (also known as Godwin's Rule of Nazi Analogies or Godwin's Law of Nazi Analogies[SUP][1][/SUP][SUP][2][/SUP]) is an argument made by Mike Godwin in 1990[SUP][2][/SUP] that has become an Internet adage. It states: "As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazisor Hitler approaches 1."[SUP][2][/SUP][SUP][3][/SUP] In other words, Godwin observed that, given enough time, in any online discussion—regardless of topic or scope—someone inevitably makes a comparison to Hitler or the Nazis.
Although in one of its early forms Godwin's law referred specifically to Usenet newsgroup discussions,[SUP][4][/SUP] the law is now often applied to any threaded online discussion, such as forums, chat rooms and blog comment threads, and has been invoked for the inappropriate use of Nazi analogies in articles or speeches.[SUP][5][/SUP]
lol, load your mags, put some food in a backpack, and oh.. honey, don't forget to turn in your homework!Well Leo since its a done deal I hope you packed some food in a backpack and are ready to resist.
The user always thinks it isAgreed, however the analogy is cogent in the current context.