Border Patrol was firing bean bags when agent Brian Terry was killed

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • CEHollier

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    8   0   0
    Dec 29, 2007
    8,973
    38
    Prairieville
    Have we as a nation lost our minds? We send our law enforcement agents to fight drug dealers with bean bags. I bet the president isn't protected with bean bags.
     

    Emperor

    Seriously Misunderstood!
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 7, 2011
    8,376
    113
    Nether region
    Have we as a nation lost our minds? We send our law enforcement agents to fight drug dealers with bean bags. I bet the president isn't protected with bean bags.

    He IS a bean bag!

    Now back to the topic; Hello massive lawsuit. Good bye tax dollars!
     
    Last edited:

    derekthib

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 90%
    18   2   0
    May 30, 2012
    302
    16
    Houma
    Our president is something else. It is like he wants to tell the world that if you want to come into America unnoticed do it via Mexico, only thing stopping you is a shallow river and bean bag loaded guns. That is a security lapse out of the world and all we hear about is giving people amnesty, the jobless situation and his secret service detail. Never mind Americas most urgent war with the border crossing cartels.
     

    Coonie

    Damn Yankee.
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    Oct 14, 2009
    529
    16
    Evanston IL
    Let's relocate all of the military bases and firing ranges along the border. If you can cross a Marine firing line, your in.
     

    USMC-Deano

    Baby Eagle FTW
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    May 20, 2011
    1,952
    36
    Oceanside, CA
    I like your idea, John. Anyone who can make it through that kind of gunfire alive deserves it. Hell, I'd want them to be my neighbor and I'd DEFINITELY want him on my team in a combat situation, because s/he is undoubtedly one lucky son of a bitch.

    Seriously, though, live ammunition is inhumane, donchano?
     

    oleheat

    Professional Amateur
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    May 18, 2009
    13,775
    38
    So it is confirmed: They gave the drug cartels real weapons, and beanbags to our USBP agents. That's a death sentence, folks.


    That is absolutely....obscene. I agree with Mr. Charles- That is simply insane. :dunno:
     

    Just A Number

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Dec 13, 2010
    157
    16
    This is not new news, it was reported at the time. Terry was assigned as less lethal coverage for the arrest. What you should be angry about is a policy requirement, that of course isn't REALLY a policy requirement that interdiction teams have to have someone standing around with LL when engaging bad guys with real guns. Cue the "but couldn't you just shoot the gun outta their hands?" or "Police shouldn't be shooting people." brigade....mongs.

    In case you missed it:
    Murdered Border Patrol Agent Brian Terry Was Armed with … Beanbags?

    Bob Owens On March 4, 2011

    Beanbags are wonderful inventions. They make comfortable if kitschy furniture [1], are a simple toy useful for early childhood development, and of course, are a key component of the addictive but disturbingly named game of cornhole [2].

    One thing beanbags are decidedly not appropriate for is being the primary armament of elite military and police agencies, a self-evident fact to almost everyone.

    Late on the night of December 14, an elite tactical unit of the U.S. Border Patrol known as *BORTAC* was working the Peck Canyon, northwest of Nogales. They were hunting a *rip crew* suspected to be operating in the area. A rip crew is a predatory criminal gang that targets drug couriers and illegals being smuggled over the border. They ambush their victims, robbing and assaulting them for their drugs or few possessions, supposing their criminal victims will never report their crimes to authorities.

    Using night vision equipment, the BORTAC team spotted five men moving through the Canyon, two of whom were carrying rifles. At least one of the officers identified the men and yelled at them to drop their weapons. Then things went bad [3]:

    When the suspected aliens did not drop their weapons, two Border Patrol agents deployed *less than lethal* beanbags at the suspected aliens. At this time, at least one of the suspected aliens fired at the Border Patrol agents. Two Border Patrol agents returned fire, one with his long gun and one with his pistol.

    Border Patrol agent Brian Terry was shot with one bullet and died shortly after. One of the suspected illegal aliens, later identified as Manuel Osorio-Arellanes, was also shot.

    Yes, you read that correctly. Faced with men using rifles, Border Patrol agents used beanbags. Why? Because of an alleged agency policy that requires engaging armed men with beanbag rounds.

    Agency doctrine that all but assured the eventual death of a federal agent. BORTAC agent Brian Terry just happened to be that first unfortunate victim of a policy developed as a combination of bureaucratic ineptitude and feel-good policing mandated by those far from the front line of America’s Third War.

    The technology of beanbag rounds are not to blame. Beanbag rounds have been around for a number of years as one of the first iterations of *less lethal* weapons designed to force a criminal suspect’s compliance through the assertion of concussive force. They are fired from designated shotguns that are usually brightly colored so they won’t be confused with shotguns loaded with buckshot or slugs. A shot-filled sock-like projectile is fired at a low velocity of several hundred feet-per-second to deliver a stunning, momentarily incapacitating blow to allow officers to rush in and physically control an uncooperative suspect.

    Doctrine has long been that less-lethals are only to be used in very prescribed situations where the subject is deemed to be a threat to themselves or others, but is not an immediately direct lethal threat. A good example would be a combative person thought to be under the influence of drugs that does not allow officers to approach within taser range. The beanbag shells themselves have very narrow operating windows or ranges: lower velocity shells are to be used from 5-20 yards, while higher velocity variants of varying designs are tailored to ranges out to 40 yards.

    There is one very important caveat to using less-lethal weapons. The standard doctrine for these less-lethal weapons is that they are only to be used in situations where the suspects are not armed with deadly weapons of their own.

    The reason is obvious. Filled with less-lethal shells, a shotgun is still unmistakably a shotgun, and when the trigger is pulled, a shotgun blast is heard, a flash and puff of smoke is seen and heard, and the weapon recoils. Any person carrying a weapon and not immediately incapacitated by the less-lethal cartridge itself is likely to judge that their life is in danger and immediately return fire with their own far more lethal firearms.

    This confusion was compounded by the fact that the event happened close to midnight; there was absolutely no way for the rip crew to verify they were actually facing off against law enforcement officers and not another rip crew. All they knew is that they were yelled at by men who identified themselves as police, and then those men started shooting at them.

    It’s a matter of training. It’s a matter of common sense.

    And it’s a matter of near criminal proportions that both long-held and carefully researched doctrine about the use of force was thrown out the window in favor of what was clearly a bureaucratic initiative made by someone hoping to mitigate the political fallout that might occur if Border Patrol agents shot a criminal alien and either killed or seriously wounded him or her.

    Border Patrol officials lied at least once [4] about the order to use beanbags in what appears to be an obvious attempt to cover up a lethally poor policy.

    Was the policy a result of uniformed agents shooting and killing a rock-throwing Mexican teen [5] in June of 2010? Was it the result of the generally apathetic to hostile feelings towards border security from DHS appointees and the White House itself?

    The only appropriate responses are an immediate revocation of the policy before it leads to the death of other Border Patrol agents and an investigation into how the policy came into being and into who was responsible for trying to cover it up and why.
     

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    196,040
    Messages
    1,551,436
    Members
    29,354
    Latest member
    Demmickb
    Top Bottom