OMG! I am so sorry your daughter had to go through that but I bet you are proud of her.
Thanks. And I'm very proud of her.
OMG! I am so sorry your daughter had to go through that but I bet you are proud of her.
IS this a joke or u being serious??????
I would really RE consider taking a class with another Instructor, keep in mind if you ever had the "need" to proove your case in court all of what you learned will be evaluated before the hammer slams that table,
Not being mean but just might be something to consider for your own good.
Check out NOLATAC posts, you might find some of it to be beneficial to you as well.
Do some research on "disparity of force" and "force of numbers", eventhough that should have been part of the class that you attended.
I find it strange that you think I'm joking. I'm doing just what you suggested, getting more training. It's not a formal class, but asking questions here is still training. Finances right now prohibit taking classes.
I'm not ex-military, nor have I ever taken any self defense courses, so this is where I'm looking for advice at the moment. If y'all think I'm wasting your time, or not being serious, tell me and I'll look elsewhere.
I find it strange that you think I'm joking. I'm doing just what you suggested, getting more training. It's not a formal class, but asking questions here is still training. Finances right now prohibit taking classes.
I'm not ex-military, nor have I ever taken any self defense courses, so this is where I'm looking for advice at the moment. If y'all think I'm wasting your time, or not being serious, tell me and I'll look elsewhere.
Thanks. And I'm very proud of her.
Ok, lets use the poster's scenario.
"Say I stop for gas at 3am. I come out after paying and there are two guys hanging out by my car. No one else around. That by itself is not a deadly threat. Can I brush my coat/shirt back so that they see I'm armed and hopefully they move on? I'm not talking about pulling my pistol and telling them to leave, just something subtle".
If I don't do anything to indicate that I am threatening or draw attention to my gun but I am open carrying instead of concealed how would that be different than if I brush my coat/shirt back so that they see I'm armed without making any overt effort to intentionally draw their attention to the gun.
Suppose I use a motion like reaching back to scratch my back while moving my shirt back without even making eye contact.
Ok, lets use the poster's scenario.
"Say I stop for gas at 3am. I come out after paying and there are two guys hanging out by my car. No one else around. That by itself is not a deadly threat. Can I brush my coat/shirt back so that they see I'm armed and hopefully they move on? I'm not talking about pulling my pistol and telling them to leave, just something subtle".
If I don't do anything to indicate that I am threatening or draw attention to my gun but I am open carrying instead of concealed how would that be different than if I brush my coat/shirt back so that they see I'm armed without making any overt effort to intentionally draw their attention to the gun.
Suppose I use a motion like reaching back to scratch my back while moving my shirt back without even making eye contact.
What about something legal... take off your cover and OC for a few min ??
IMHO If you just paid for gas and were leavin the store and "tyrone" was at your car, there is no point in escalating the situation. If from a distance you ask them to leave and they do not comply there is no reason for you to risk your life, head back inside call the authorities. There is no reason for violence if it can be avoided especially if you admit to needing more training. I carry as a last resort and am willing to use it if needed but in that senario I see no immediate use for a firearm nor am I willing put myself in greater danger. I carry to mitigate danger, approaching a possibly violent situation isn't in my best interest.
I'm not that up on Louisiana laws but I am familiar with Texas' with the only real difference being Louisiana's OC law so I will go ahead and add my .02 here.
In the scenario where a person sweeps their coat back with the intention of displaying their weapon, as a level of force, it becomes just that; your use of a certain level of force against whoever it is that your are displaying to.
When you remove your coat, it cannot reliably be considered the same use of force, IMO, because under reasonable assumption, you were engaging in an everyday activity that is a normal part of everyone's life. The showing of the gun is happenstantial because there is no obvious intent on your part to use it as a force against anyone.
That's how I see it anyway.
It might help to understand the use of force continuum as defined by the Dept of Justice. Here's the link to their definition.
http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/nij/topics/law-enforcement/officer-safety/use-of-force/continuum.htm
In a nutshell, and please correct me if I'm wrong on any of this, it says that a persons simple presence is the lowest level of force, but it is considered force because it can "force" a person to alter their behavior. Signs and hand and arm signals fall into this category also.
The next is your voice, then on to the laying of hands, then less than lethal, then lethal force, which is the highest level use of force.
In my experience, the rules of the use of force says it is only reasonable to use only the next level of force you are facing in order to stop the aggression unless that level is not effective. Only then can you, reasonably, elevate to the next level of force.
This means that if I flip you the bird you cannot shoot me. However, if I grab your arm to keep you from moving, you are allowed to strike me until I let go of you.
Anyone disagree? Hahahah great question to ask around here, huh?
Cool. Thanks for the acknowledgement.