posse comatosis
Hoo-ahh!
Would Barack Obama as President pull the necessary strings to outlaw concealed carry in the U.S.?
CCW Status If Obama Wins
- Thread starter posse comatosis
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
That will be his goal. He already doesn't believe anyone should own guns.
He owes the Brady bunch and all of his anti-American friends and that is how he will repay them.
This is only one of the freedoms he will take away,
He owes the Brady bunch and all of his anti-American friends and that is how he will repay them.
This is only one of the freedoms he will take away,
gbundersea
Just my 2¢
If Hussein ObamaSama gets elected, we could lose ALL rights to own firearms in an instant. All they need to do is ratify a UN- and IANSA-backed treaty to prohibit small arms, and the 2A is effectively over.
From Wikipedia: The Senate also has a role in the process of ratifying treaties. The Constitution provides that the President may only ratify a treaty if two-thirds of the senators vote to grant advice and consent. However, not all international agreements are considered treaties, and therefore do not require the Senate's approval. Congress has passed laws authorizing the President to conclude executive agreements without action by the Senate. Similarly, the President may make congressional-executive agreements with the approval of a simple majority in each House of Congress, rather than a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Neither executive agreements nor congressional-executive agreements are mentioned in the Constitution, leading some to suggest that they unconstitutionally circumvent the treaty-ratification process. However, the validity of such agreements has been upheld by courts.
From Wikipedia: The Senate also has a role in the process of ratifying treaties. The Constitution provides that the President may only ratify a treaty if two-thirds of the senators vote to grant advice and consent. However, not all international agreements are considered treaties, and therefore do not require the Senate's approval. Congress has passed laws authorizing the President to conclude executive agreements without action by the Senate. Similarly, the President may make congressional-executive agreements with the approval of a simple majority in each House of Congress, rather than a two-thirds majority in the Senate. Neither executive agreements nor congressional-executive agreements are mentioned in the Constitution, leading some to suggest that they unconstitutionally circumvent the treaty-ratification process. However, the validity of such agreements has been upheld by courts.
posse comatosis
Hoo-ahh!
Never bothered to get a ccw permit after taking the Louisiana course in 06, perhaps no use to try now:
http://forum.pafoa.org/concealed-op...ts-will-push-federal-ban-concealed-carry.html
http://forum.pafoa.org/concealed-op...ts-will-push-federal-ban-concealed-carry.html
tjmorris58
New Member
Go for your permit!!! There is strength in numbers. The number of permits are on the rise and that should voice our opinion on where we stand. Politicians look at numbers and will not go against the people who can put them in office or remove them from office.
posse comatosis
Hoo-ahh!
It is completely illogical and probably illegal that a qualifying course for a four year permit would only be valid for one year. And there is no time limitation of handgun training in the military as a substitute for a CCW course. More brain dead beauracratic BS from BR.
