Read all of his statements in an old black man's voice and it sounds profound.
I watched the whole thing and still don't understand how he thinks black had more freedom under slavery than they do now and that family members who were bought and sold at the whim of someone else had a better family life than they do now. To an extent I get what he is trying to say, but what he actually said is so far from the truth.
The guy is not very bright! Therefore, his articulation of his point was terrible. I watched too and I think that the media took and replaced some punctuation marks in his statement.
If I stand back objectively I hear him saying that blacks in America are more oppressed by the "Free ****" givers, then when they were oppressed by Clive's Great, Great, Great, Grandfather!
Never forget how twisted the media in the country is! Sometimes, I think I am listening to the Tass News Agency!
I also see the humorous irony in a man fighting to keep getting free ****(grazing for his cattle) saying free **** oppresses people.
That's about what I got out of it, and if he would've just said "minorities in America are oppressed by gov subsidies because it robs them of their independence and happiness" I would've agreed. Saying that blacks are less free now than when they were slaves is demonstrably untrue.
I also see the humorous irony in a man fighting to keep getting free ****(grazing for his cattle) saying free **** oppresses people.
For the life of me I can't figure out why people came across the country to defend this guy but ignore much more compelling stories and issues(see king's ft Polk thread for an example).
I also see the humorous irony in a man fighting to keep getting free ****(grazing for his cattle) saying free **** oppresses people.
Good point!
Yea...I get it. He may have "meant" to say something else.
BUT...when one gets a little bit of stardom...their 15 minutes of fame so to speak...they should realize that NOW...every word they say will be dissected. He should have hired a lawyer as his mouthpiece. I have no sympathy for him. This kind of crap is so typical. He wants to get his free land to graze cattle yet is pissed when a single mother gets free food stamps.
BS....typical BS...Just like the guy who inherited his fathers business....a business like a sugar producer which lives and dies through subsidies....Yet hates anyone who gets all that free ****.
ALSO>>>>This country is full of 50 y/os bitching about all the free chit....who in 17 years....will retire and get free medical and a SS paycheck every month. Their attitude will soften. Always been that way.
ALSO>>>>This country is full of 50 y/os bitching about all the free chit....who in 17 years....will retire and get free medical and a SS paycheck every month. Their attitude will soften. Always been that way.
In the physical sense yes, in the moral and ethical sense no.
Out of the two, only one even comes close to being genuine "free ****".
I'll let everyone guess which one I'm referring to.
You don't see use of thousands of acres of land that doesn't belong to him is anything but free ****?
What moral and ethical sense, please give examples. Modern welfare dependants still get their food and housing from someone else, but they literally have more freedoms. They can legally own firearms, vote, and walk out of their home and do whatever they want, can marry whoever they want, have kids with whoever they want, keep those kids, etc etc.
I see desert, Jack. Acres & acres of desert.
If anyone is giving "free ****" in this case, it's Bundy himself. From his cows.
The environmentalist should embrace him for providing organic fertilizer- thus helping to bring life to this wasteland (saving the planet).
Honest to God- I do not care that this man has been getting some use (free or not) out of this otherwise useless property. The fact is it's not good for much of anything else. Sure as hell isn't worth sending in an armed response. But that's just my .02.
I see desert, Jack. Acres & acres of desert.
If anyone is giving "free ****" in this case, it's Bundy himself. From his cows.
The environmentalist should embrace him for providing organic fertilizer- thus helping to bring life to this wasteland (saving the planet).
Honest to God- I do not care that this man has been getting some use (free or not) out of this otherwise useless property. The fact is it's not good for much of anything else. Sure as hell isn't worth sending in an armed response. But that's just my .02.