ABNsurveyor
Well-Known Member
My form 1 that was submitted on 29 Nov 13 was disapproved today for Block 4d Model: PA15MULTI.
For the word “MULTI.” I explained to the examiner that that was the model engraved on the receiver. She explained to me that you cannot list “MULTI” anywhere on an ATF Form. She understood that was the correct nomenclature of the receiver but the only way they can approve it is if I re-submit the weapon model as PA15. She also said that she is disapproving forms for having “.223/5.56” in block 4d. As that denotes a multi caliber weapon even though you will only list one caliber in Block 4c.
The examiner was very professional and even sympathetic with me as they do not agree with this, but the law is the law and that is what they have to go by. My $200 is being refunded and should see it back on my CC in about two weeks.
So in order to register this receiver as a SBR I will have to incorrectly list the model on the Form 1. So if I do incorrectly list the model nomenclature on the form and it gets approved and some time down the road I have to show my paperwork to a LEO as they see me with a SBR and ask for my paperwork. I had over my trust and approved Form 1 and he tries to match Block 4d with the weapon and they do not match I am now in a position to be arrested for having an unregistered SBR. Even though the ATF said not to list the actual model nomenclature because they cannot approve a Form 1 with the word “MULTI” anywhere on it.
WOW! Government stupidly at its finest.
I am going to play it safe and use a different lower receiver that I can list the correct nomenclature in Block 4d. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.
For the word “MULTI.” I explained to the examiner that that was the model engraved on the receiver. She explained to me that you cannot list “MULTI” anywhere on an ATF Form. She understood that was the correct nomenclature of the receiver but the only way they can approve it is if I re-submit the weapon model as PA15. She also said that she is disapproving forms for having “.223/5.56” in block 4d. As that denotes a multi caliber weapon even though you will only list one caliber in Block 4c.
The examiner was very professional and even sympathetic with me as they do not agree with this, but the law is the law and that is what they have to go by. My $200 is being refunded and should see it back on my CC in about two weeks.
So in order to register this receiver as a SBR I will have to incorrectly list the model on the Form 1. So if I do incorrectly list the model nomenclature on the form and it gets approved and some time down the road I have to show my paperwork to a LEO as they see me with a SBR and ask for my paperwork. I had over my trust and approved Form 1 and he tries to match Block 4d with the weapon and they do not match I am now in a position to be arrested for having an unregistered SBR. Even though the ATF said not to list the actual model nomenclature because they cannot approve a Form 1 with the word “MULTI” anywhere on it.
WOW! Government stupidly at its finest.
I am going to play it safe and use a different lower receiver that I can list the correct nomenclature in Block 4d. An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure.