After seeing the 8 pages of post on upgrading BS, it made me think of Gun Mags. I used to love American Handgunner, it had lots of articles on our sport and great gun test data with a few knives thrown in. Now we have writers like Mike "Duke" Venturino with the same old lame articles published in about 4other rags. Always reports on reloading with lead, yet he test them with the same old Luger, .45 Colt, antique Bisley's etc. I quit reading Guns and Ammo because the gunwriters testing guns made ridiculous claims and never reported the bad about a weapon. For example they'll give an accuracy test and you see that in fine print that it was shot at 7 or 10 yards from a sand bag, well I can make any gun look good at that distance. Real test use a Ransom rest at 25 and 50 yards. I have always did better accuracy wise with the same gun and ammo in my test which makes me wonder about their ability to shoot. Also in the reloading section with J.D.Smith, his articles never have anything about .38 special, 9mm, .40, or .45, always some oddball rifle cartridge in a pistol. "Annual's" have the same pics and prices (that aren't up to date) of guns, no annual's have any meaningful info in the few articles they have. Now the rage in mags is "Tactical" or "Home Defense". What ever happened to writers like Skeeter Skelton, or Bill Jordan. I'd love to see a mag on just guns and ammo we use in our sport of USPSA, IDPA, PPM, Steel Challange, pros and cons of the guns and makers, and realistic test etc.