Well this is about right. Does not appear a friend to gun owners.
https://www.thedailybeast.com/chief...gun-owners-request-to-stay-ban-on-bump-stocks
https://www.thedailybeast.com/chief...gun-owners-request-to-stay-ban-on-bump-stocks
I don't have a bumpstock, nor want one. But any item that goes on a firearm should be protected. What's to stop them from banning any other accessory that we use, like a scope, sling, bipod, silencer, or flash suppressor. They can make up any excuse to ban them. None are constitutionally protected, but as they say it is a slippery slope.
So just because it’s an accessory it should be protected? Guess I’m not understanding
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
It should be protected because it does not violate any laws.
Neither did speeding, murder, robbery, etc until they made it a law
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Exactly. Are bump stocks banned because of a law?
That will be the end result
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
That will be the end result
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
She sounds like quite the wolverine
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
Man made speeding a law. Murder and robbery were already law since it was put on stone a very long time ago. Look at New Zealand, there is an effort to turn us into the same sheep. They are stepping up their efforts, and if the 2020 election goes south, well things may get very bad real quick.