TomTerrific
Well-Known Member
"is more of an anarchist than a crusader for anyone's rights"
That's the best explanation, so far, even if it is opinion ! It frames the controversy more clearly.
leVieux
Hits the nail on the head for me, too.
I don't know what the controversy is. It appears B.Sers consider him eccentric at best and raving nuts as worst.
There's a saying "A blind hog finds an acorn every now and then." Being a nut case doesn't rule out having an occasional good idea.
Anyone who considers DVs as being on welfare doesn't exhibit enough judgement to be taken seriously.
Last edited: