From her Q&A linked in that article:
"There is no question, after Heller, that the Second Amendment guarantees Americans the individual right to possess and carry weapons in case of confrontation."
Q. If you are confirmed, will you commit to protect an individual’s right to possess a
firearm?
Answer: If I am confirmed, I will commit to show Heller and the principles
articulated in it the full measure of respect that is due to all constitutional
decisions of the Court. Only highly unusual circumstances can justify the
Solicitor General’s office in asking the Court to reconsider a decision, especially
one as thoroughly considered as Heller. Once again, there is no question, after
Heller, that the Second Amendment guarantees individuals the right to keep and
bear arms and that this right, like others in the Constitution, provides strong
although not unlimited protection against governmental regulation.
I'll take a "not sympathetic" on someone breaking the law as long as they will make the above statements too. Could be worse considering who is doing the nominating.
The guy broke an unconstitutional law.
Hunhhh ??
Only thing I missed is someone saying she looked a lot like the buk stops here Reno, the wicked witch of waco
There must be a special ugly lesbian farm somewhere that these people come from
May 13 (Bloomberg) -- Elena Kagan said as a U.S. Supreme Court law clerk in 1987 that she was “not sympathetic” toward a man who contended that his constitutional rights were violated when he was convicted for carrying an unlicensed pistol.
What a shock.
I suspect there is a 90% chance she gets the nod.
Obama has managed to get two young (for scotus) actual socialists onto the highest court in the land. In less than two years.