“The right of individuals to acquire, keep, possess, transport, carry, transfer, and use arms for defense of life and liberty, and for all other legitimate purposes is fundamental and shall not be denied or infringed, and any restriction on this right must be subjected to strict scrutiny.”
2 problems I see:
1) "legitimate purposes" You can drive a truck through that loophole. Its ambiguity means that by redefining "legitimate purposes" they can do anything they want.
2) "Strict Scrutiny" What does that mean? Just think about how much "Advise and Consent" has been twisted, and you see what I mean.
2 problems I see:
1) "legitimate purposes" You can drive a truck through that loophole. Its ambiguity means that by redefining "legitimate purposes" they can do anything they want.
2) "Strict Scrutiny" What does that mean? Just think about how much "Advise and Consent" has been twisted, and you see what I mean.