He's very good at his job, but that's not what makes him a *******.
I find it funny how people here stand on their soap box shouting "shall not be infringed" then turn around and hammer a trail lawyer for being excellent at defending his clients. They seem to forget that whole "innocent until proven guilty in a court of law" thing.
He is a ass. That has been agreed upon here. Is he good at getting his clients off, yes, I would agree to that. But he gave inflammatory comments that were called out and rebutted. My opinion, getting someone off for stealing or misappropriating funds is one thing. Defending a cold blooded killer is another. He can decline clients and I would never take one like that if I were a lawyer. But I'm not. I heard but can not confirm that he took that case pro bono for nothing but publicity. Not an indigent defender case. My opinion. So GFY.