hunter5567
Monolithic Mentor
They are classifying FRT's (Forced Reset Triggers) as machineguns now.
If it could be proven that the brace redesigns the firearm into rifle to be fired from the shoulder, would the braces have ever been approved?One thing that has me concerned is the current definition of "rifle".
If it can be proven that the brace redesigns the firearm into rifle to be fired from the shoulder, theres an issue.
(7)
The term “rifle” means a weapon designed or redesigned, made or remade, and intended to be fired from the shoulder and designed or redesigned and made or remade to use the energy of an explosive to fire only a single projectile through a rifled bore for each single pull of the trigger.
Just making an observation, not saying I want this...If it could be proven that the brace redesigns the firearm into rifle to be fired from the shoulder, would the braces have ever been approved?
A bit contradictory, no?
Just making an observation, not saying I want this...
I think if/when this goes to court, it is probably more likely that the court will find that these should never have been classified as pistols to begin with (ATF screwed up) rather than that the ATF overstepped its bounds by removing the designation. And I'm not confident that SCOTUS would overrule that decision. That would give everyone in government a nice, clean way to get rid of this issue completely.
Well, he seems to be ok with "them" knowing what he has and where he lives, so he's going to add a few more to his list. Next response is he's NOT okay with registering high capacity mags. If that isn't the definition of contradictory, I'm not sure what is.How is it contradictory?
Current decision to reclassify braced pistols as SBRs is more in line with existing written law than allowing braced pistols was, in my opinion. I am predicting that is the direction a federal court will eventually take this situation.So the current decision is a good one because the ATF in inept at doing its job?
Winner, winner, chicken dinner.Pistol brace was a work around that I'm sure many of us knew would end sooner or later. Maybe time and money should have been or be spent on fighting the sbr law.
Foot guns….“Intent” is next to impossible to prove without self admission of guilt…. No body knows for sure what I intend to do unless I tell them… there’s speculation and hear say… but that’s all
If you put a pistol to your sholder and shoot it did you redesign or redefine the gun to an sbr?
Or shoot a shotgun/rifle with one hand, did you make to a pistol instantly…
Well, he seems to be ok with "them" knowing what he has and where he lives, so he's going to add a few more to his list. Next response is he's NOT okay with registering high capacity mags. If that isn't the definition of contradictory, I'm not sure what is.
It would appear you don't know the definition of contradictory so I'll help you out.
con·tra·dic·to·ry - /ˌkäntrəˈdiktərē/ - adjective - mutually opposed or inconsistent.
Let me try to explain why you're wrong. In his post, he mentioned the following: "I have a pile of approved stamps in the sbr, sbs, and silencer categories. 'THEY' already know what I have and where I live, let’s add a few more to the list." He's describing items that fall under the National Firearms Act. He's willing to add a few more to the list of items that fall under the National Firearms Act. He's not interested in registering items the do not fall under the National Firearms Act. Those are not at all inconsistent statements.
Of course, properly fought, the pistol brace decision could be ground for a 2A challenge of the SBR law in its entirety. We can always hope.
I am playing the wait and see what happens with this. I have a feeling with our pro-2A SCOTUS they will agree this is an unconstitutional ruling.
I have read comments that a braced pistol cannot be put in a trust but never saw anything official. Maybe I missed it. If that’s true can I just remove the brace and add a stock and register as an SBR?
more lies!!!! well kinda lol, nobody has processed a ar braced pistol to there nfa trust becuase there was no need to.... it wasnt an nfa item, so never would have been needed to add to trustYes you can.