I am a little embarrased to admit that before now I always used a "decent" cheap scope for my rifles. By "decent" I mean - I didn't know any better and purchased a Bushnell or a BSA. Last season I happened to have a nice sized buck in my scope and as I settled in to take the shot I -- exhaled. I couldn't see a damn thing for about a minute while I waited for my glass to defog. During this time I watched my dinner slowly walk away none the wiser until I let a stream of cuss words out when I figured I wouldn't be eating fresh backstrap that night. I decided this year to buy a little better scope. I don't have the funds to go Swarvoski or Zeiss, but I had my heart set on a Leuopold VX II. A buddy of mine swears by Nikon. He claims that a Buckmaster Scope is just as good if not better than VX II. What is the general consensus out there? I am interested if it is as good with a better price tag, but I am also slowly coming to realize that you get what you pay for. So... let the debate begin! Also this is going on a Howa 1500 7mm 08. I will probably never get a shot over 300 yds.