Well if the police can't find the weapon the shooter claims the alleged attacker had in his hand then it's a no brain-er. The shooter killed an innocent man. If the shooter claims the man had a pipe or other instrument and was preparing to attack, then where is it? For all we know, the witness could be a plant, there to corroborate a false claim by the shooter. If I were the investigating officer, the shooter would be under arrest. There is no evidence to support his claim. A man flailing his arms is not grounds to use deadly force!
Especially considering that the shooter was IN HIS VEHICLE and the supposed "assailant" did not enter, or attempt to enter, or attempt to remove the shooter from said vehicle, nor possess a weapon to harm the shooter while he remained in his vehicle. Nor did he attack the vehicle. This is absolute and utter ********.
The best they can say is "He swung his fists towards the driver's window". He well could have been yards away--considering a leash was mistaken for a pipe at this distance, one would think he was NOT in any danger of breaking or passing through the window.
Last edited: