White House Defends Loaded Guns In Parks

[Mouthpiece]

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009...main4805192.shtml?source=RSSattr=U.S._4805192

Who would've thought?

Being the cynic that I am, I will guess they will cave on the environmental issue and reverse policy.

 

[tactical723]

Wait, I am getting off the floor and back into my chair, his admn is so &^%$#^ up,,,the right hand does not know what the left hand is doing, go figure !!!!

 

[Louisiana Shooter]

The admin is denying the well proven fact that armed people are safer - the new rule "does not alter the environmental status quo, and will not have any significant impacts on public health and safety."

Look for the change to be challenged in the less public rulemaking process, rather than a courtroom.

 

[MALIBU12]

wtf?????

 

[dmh]

Maybe they realize that they have bitten off more than they can chew on the gun issue????

 

[Speedlace]

:waits for prices on firearms to drop:

 

[posse comatosis]

Some parks, you might get by with a concealed weapon for two legged predators. But in other parks, you need to carry big iron for protection against bear, moose and mountain lion attacks. It's totaly assinine that large caliber handguns are required to be concealed if carried in national parks. It can be done, but it serves no purpose in wilderness areas. What f*****g idiots we have in the Congress.