These videos are fairly worthless from
A probative stand point. We see the climax but not what lead to it. Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.
These videos are fairly worthless from
A probative stand point. We see the climax but not what lead to it. Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.
Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.
I'm saying it is unjustified. Deadly force was certainly not necessary here - I've dealt with situations like this overseas. Deadly force should only be applied if there is a threat to officer safety, which of course there was not. They could have easily tased or bean bagged this guy from a safe distance. I find it disturbing now that we've become so accustomed to it that wielding a knife justifies being shot from a distance. If this is permissible for law enforcement then essentially anything can now be justified as non-compliant and threatening (I'm referring to action not verbal).
I watched it, and studied the circumstances..
Here are the facts, The neighbors living in the area called to complain, since it was not a legal spot..
Given the call, the cops had to show up.
Given the fact the guy was ranting about killing them, and would not comply, they escalated the force.. he pulls two knives... he gets shot
They bean bag him to see if he is responsive to pain after he is down, since the knife was in his hand still..
things I learned after some google work.. The guy was considered a mental patient, known to be violent and had cut at least one person a few years prior. (unknown if the responding Leo knew this)
I cant see where any wrong was done.. I went into it, expecting the cops to be winded and shaky from the climb, and sympathetically pulled the trigger due to the cardio/and adrenalin. I did not see that in this vid.. the voices were calm, they called in a negotiator I think or someone trained anyway..
My two cents..
Dave
I'm saying it is unjustified. Deadly force was certainly not necessary here - I've dealt with situations like this overseas. Deadly force should only be applied if there is a threat to officer safety, which of course there was not. They could have easily tased or bean bagged this guy from a safe distance. I find it disturbing now that we've become so accustomed to it that wielding a knife justifies being shot from a distance. If this is permissible for law enforcement then essentially anything can now be justified as non-compliant and threatening (I'm referring to action not verbal).
Totally unjustified. They should have just talked to the guy and ended the incident peacefully like these cops...
Hmmmmmm, so the Police should let themselves get stabbed? I'm not sure what the Police did that made him pull a knife? Seems like he pulled not one but two knives, of his own volition, for a reason. I doubt it was to further the discussion. At what point would the Police have been justified? Is there a "Not Safe" Distance?