Albuquerque, NM camper shooting...

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • themcfarland

    tactical hangover
    Rating - 100%
    58   0   0
    Dec 6, 2008
    4,666
    63
    Destrehan
    I watched it, and studied the circumstances..

    Here are the facts, The neighbors living in the area called to complain, since it was not a legal spot..
    Given the call, the cops had to show up.
    Given the fact the guy was ranting about killing them, and would not comply, they escalated the force.. he pulls two knives... he gets shot
    They bean bag him to see if he is responsive to pain after he is down, since the knife was in his hand still..

    things I learned after some google work.. The guy was considered a mental patient, known to be violent and had cut at least one person a few years prior. (unknown if the responding Leo knew this)


    I cant see where any wrong was done.. I went into it, expecting the cops to be winded and shaky from the climb, and sympathetically pulled the trigger due to the cardio/and adrenalin. I did not see that in this vid.. the voices were calm, they called in a negotiator I think or someone trained anyway..

    My two cents..

    Dave
     

    JWG223

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    7   0   0
    Aug 16, 2011
    6,000
    36
    Shreveport
    That's what I read and decided. Obviously the video is being proposed by many to be proof of LE wrongdoing, but they present it as if that 3 minutes was the whole ordeal.
     

    themcfarland

    tactical hangover
    Rating - 100%
    58   0   0
    Dec 6, 2008
    4,666
    63
    Destrehan
    I was not there but I think if they cop(s) did wrong, they would have been charged just like anyone else.
    Like I said, I went in expecting to see a shaking hand, and did not see that.. I went in expecting some kind of wrong doing from a shooter.. I did not see that..

    The reason I say I was looking for it, I have seen the short version of the video and it along with posts on FB groups made me think it was more of an escalation and all heated.. they guys looked professional and squared away.. Now keep in mind my short experiences and mostly from the outside looking in..
     

    Vanilla Gorilla

    The Gringo Pistolero
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 22, 2008
    6,468
    36
    These videos are fairly worthless from
    A probative stand point. We see the climax but not what lead to it. Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.
     

    JR1572

    Well-Known Member
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    58   0   0
    Nov 30, 2008
    6,696
    48
    Madisonville, LA
    These videos are fairly worthless from
    A probative stand point. We see the climax but not what lead to it. Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.

    This.

    JR1572
     

    Pas Tout La

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    2   0   0
    Dec 12, 2012
    1,302
    38
    Droite La
    These videos are fairly worthless from
    A probative stand point. We see the climax but not what lead to it. Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.

    Good words to live by right there.
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    Bottom line if you introduce a weapon into a confrontation with Police you stand an exponentially greater chance of being shot. Whether your right or wrong your still shot.


    I'll add, if I may ;) ...

    If you do (ANYTHING),
    but COMPLY,
    with Law Enforcement Officers
    giving you clear and concise commands....
    ...you stand an exponentially greater chance of ...etc..etc...


    Most folks like this are begging for trouble.
    Hell a flash Bang went off at his feet,
    yet still he refused to COMPLY with orders,
    and instead escalated the situation by NOT keeping his hands up,
    and drawing a lethal weapon.

    Justified Shoot...in my humble opinion.

    ...and like Nate mentioned towards. If you're being wronged, it's better to survive and have your day in court,
    than to go full retard and end up shot or dead, with NO day in court.
     
    Last edited:

    radney

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    May 17, 2010
    629
    16
    Mandeviille
    I'm saying it is unjustified. Deadly force was certainly not necessary here - I've dealt with situations like this overseas. Deadly force should only be applied if there is a threat to officer safety, which of course there was not. They could have easily tased or bean bagged this guy from a safe distance. I find it disturbing now that we've become so accustomed to it that wielding a knife justifies being shot from a distance. If this is permissible for law enforcement then essentially anything can now be justified as non-compliant and threatening (I'm referring to action not verbal).
     

    Vanilla Gorilla

    The Gringo Pistolero
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 22, 2008
    6,468
    36
    Hmmmmmm, so the Police should let themselves get stabbed? I'm not sure what the Police did that made him pull a knife? Seems like he pulled not one but two knives, of his own volition, for a reason. I doubt it was to further the discussion. At what point would the Police have been justified? Is there a "Not Safe" Distance?
     

    Jack

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    40   0   0
    Dec 9, 2010
    8,602
    63
    Covington
    I'm saying it is unjustified. Deadly force was certainly not necessary here - I've dealt with situations like this overseas. Deadly force should only be applied if there is a threat to officer safety, which of course there was not. They could have easily tased or bean bagged this guy from a safe distance. I find it disturbing now that we've become so accustomed to it that wielding a knife justifies being shot from a distance. If this is permissible for law enforcement then essentially anything can now be justified as non-compliant and threatening (I'm referring to action not verbal).

    How many feet is safe distance? Given his response to the flash grenade, would you have confidence that shooting him(outside of a no response shot) if he started running towards an officer would stop him? If an 80 year old lady gets a knife pulled on her by someone at that distance after he screams "bitch I'll kill you" is that a good shoot?
     

    MOTOR51

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    72   0   0
    Dec 23, 2008
    6,342
    113
    here
    I watched it, and studied the circumstances..

    Here are the facts, The neighbors living in the area called to complain, since it was not a legal spot..
    Given the call, the cops had to show up.
    Given the fact the guy was ranting about killing them, and would not comply, they escalated the force.. he pulls two knives... he gets shot
    They bean bag him to see if he is responsive to pain after he is down, since the knife was in his hand still..

    things I learned after some google work.. The guy was considered a mental patient, known to be violent and had cut at least one person a few years prior. (unknown if the responding Leo knew this)


    I cant see where any wrong was done.. I went into it, expecting the cops to be winded and shaky from the climb, and sympathetically pulled the trigger due to the cardio/and adrenalin. I did not see that in this vid.. the voices were calm, they called in a negotiator I think or someone trained anyway..

    My two cents..

    Dave

    I'm saying it is unjustified. Deadly force was certainly not necessary here - I've dealt with situations like this overseas. Deadly force should only be applied if there is a threat to officer safety, which of course there was not. They could have easily tased or bean bagged this guy from a safe distance. I find it disturbing now that we've become so accustomed to it that wielding a knife justifies being shot from a distance. If this is permissible for law enforcement then essentially anything can now be justified as non-compliant and threatening (I'm referring to action not verbal).

    Never mind

    Sent from my XT1058 using Tapatalk
     

    general mills

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    10   0   0
    May 1, 2010
    1,539
    38
    Denham Springs (BR,Hammond area)
    Speedracer, that is the exact video that came to my mind. I don't see the problem. Police say get on the ground, instead, you grab 2 knives, you just asked to be shot. They did not approach him holding 2 knives and ask him to put them down, He turned a verbal confrontation into a armed confrontation, and the police met deadly force with deadly force.
     

    freedive10

    -Global Mod-, Caballoloco
    Rating - 100%
    30   0   0
    Sep 17, 2008
    2,165
    63
    Mandeville
    Totally unjustified. They should have just talked to the guy and ended the incident peacefully like these cops...



    This incident happened in Nicaragua and sad to say, plays out much the same in Central America!!!!!!! Officers are really not trained very well over there!
     

    radney

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    May 17, 2010
    629
    16
    Mandeviille
    Hmmmmmm, so the Police should let themselves get stabbed? I'm not sure what the Police did that made him pull a knife? Seems like he pulled not one but two knives, of his own volition, for a reason. I doubt it was to further the discussion. At what point would the Police have been justified? Is there a "Not Safe" Distance?

    First of all, they could've maintained plenty of distance to tase or bean bag him without risking anything. If he lunges, that is different. He made no attempt to stab them - they gave him the opportunity by getting close. He could've been easily disarmed without deadly force from a safe distance.

    And job number one is not to go home to wife and baby :rofl: These are civilians dealing with other civilians - this isn't combat. This paramilitary mindset that is pervading police was humorous in the past but is getting out of control now.
     

    radney

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    May 17, 2010
    629
    16
    Mandeviille
    Now before everyone goes all thin blue line on this I'll make clear that I am all for officer safety. I don't think they should take unnecessary risks. Approaching this guy, stun grenade or not, was not necessary - it manufactured the risk. No one was in immediate danger here and he shouldn't have been approached. Just sit back and use less than lethal until he complies.
     
    Top Bottom