Military: fire on US citizens!

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • 10November1775

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 14, 2010
    158
    16
    Sure you do. No soldier is obligated to obey illegal orders. Else the Nuremberg trials were a horrible injustice.

    How many prosecuted were enlisted? Decisions on what is lawful or not come from the top. I understand what you are saying, and theoretically you are correct. I'm just saying, in the real world things work differently. Every service member has the obligation to disobey an unlawful order, but the way the military works it would be difficult to go against the grain. Most would do what they were told; history shows that to be the rule rather than the exception.
     

    Emperor

    Seriously Misunderstood!
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 7, 2011
    8,376
    113
    Nether region
    My point was that if you wish to review the military firing on US citizens you may wish to google Kent State. I am lost on what your point is.

    And look at what happened! The hippies have the last laugh; so far?!?

    Grow up in 60's > Protest War > Get shot upon at Kent State (and euphemistically all over) > Teach (as academians in the country's colleges), their kids to ruin their country in return!

    Next move?
     

    Leonidas

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Mar 4, 2010
    6,346
    38
    Slidell
    And look at what happened! The hippies have the last laugh; so far?!?

    Grow up in 60's > Protest War > Get shot upon at Kent State (and euphemistically all over) > Teach (as academians in the country's colleges), their kids to ruin their country in return!

    Next move?


    God, how I love a well spoken pessimist?

    :D
     

    JNieman

    Dush
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 11, 2011
    4,743
    48
    Lafayette
    My point was that if you wish to review the military firing on US citizens you may wish to google Kent State. I am lost on what your point is.
    My point is that saying two words without an explanation says nothing. If you're using Kent State as an explanation of some point you should expand on it... we will likely all derive different conclusions and lessons from it. Such as me, for example, I don't believe it would/could happen again, right now, from the Federal Government.
     

    Leonidas

    *Banned*
    Rating - 100%
    12   0   0
    Mar 4, 2010
    6,346
    38
    Slidell
    My point is that saying two words without an explanation says nothing. If you're using Kent State as an explanation of some point you should expand on it... we will likely all derive different conclusions and lessons from it. Such as me, for example, I don't believe it would/could happen again, right now, from the Federal Government.

    I don't think so from the military.

    I'm damned sure it could from the Feds.
     

    JNieman

    Dush
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Jul 11, 2011
    4,743
    48
    Lafayette
    I don't think so from the military.

    I'm damned sure it could from the Feds.
    Sorry, I did choose my words poorly. I mostly agree with you. I was intending to mean 'Federal Government' as in full on military.

    I do believe the ATF, FBI, DHS and the other alphabet soup agencies have the mentality of every citizen being a criminal until proven otherwise, and that they have no qualms shooting first and asking questions later, unfortunately. Their track record has been one with too much innocent blood and little to no accountability. The military mishaps have had accountability and have evolved... the federal agencies have not.
     

    10November1775

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 0%
    0   0   0
    Sep 14, 2010
    158
    16
    It has happened in the past and it will happen again. And after it happens, some years later, everyone will say "we're sorry, those were different circumstances, that would never happen again, the government/military wouldn't do that to its own citizens."

    If your adversary has underestimated you, you have already won the first battle.
     

    Emperor

    Seriously Misunderstood!
    Rating - 100%
    11   0   0
    Mar 7, 2011
    8,376
    113
    Nether region
    Sorry, I did choose my words poorly. I mostly agree with you. I was intending to mean 'Federal Government' as in full on military.

    I do believe the ATF, FBI, DHS and the other alphabet soup agencies have the mentality of every citizen being a criminal until proven otherwise, and that they have no qualms shooting first and asking questions later, unfortunately. Their track record has been one with too much innocent blood and little to no accountability. The military mishaps have had accountability and have evolved... the federal agencies have not.

    Illustrated by the accountability flow chart below: (just fill in the blanks with current administration heads).

    mafia-family-tree.jpg
     
    Last edited:

    cajun 22

    Shooter
    Rating - 100%
    40   0   0
    May 22, 2008
    1,497
    48
    Houma, LA
    There may be some substance to this. Maybe. A good friend of mine just came home from two deployments and was asked some disturbing questions on his exit interview. The big one was, if ordered to would he fire on US citizens? His answer was " I will not fire upon the very people I risked my life for. Sorry, I'm not your guy."
     

    GunAddict

    constitutionalist
    Rating - 100%
    9   0   0
    Feb 23, 2008
    654
    16
    North Monroe, La. area
    This past week a man calls in to a radio show. Don't remember if former enlisted or still is but he said he was on the ground during Katrina and had orders to shoot if resistance occurred. He said at that time being newly enlisted he would have as he wanted to do a good job following orders. He said now he would not and really felt bad about what he did then. And most of those there would have fired if needed to. I believe that is the case with most of the newly enlisted, most will follow whatever order given. It is the older members that have learned different. Even with NOPD, a friend now retired from there said he tried to tell the new officers you can't just go and take peoples guns, but they did not listen to him. They were doing what they were told to do. I still question why homeland security needs 1.6 million rounds of hp, being that is enough to shoot every man, woman, and child several times here in the states. Are they gonna arm the tsa and send them forth??:ohreally:
     
    Last edited:

    Jack

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    40   0   0
    Dec 9, 2010
    8,602
    63
    Covington
    This past week a man calls in to a radio show. Don't remember if former enlisted or still is but he said he was on the ground during Katrina and had orders to shoot if resistance occurred. He said at that time being newly enlisted he would have as he wanted to do a good job following orders. He said now he would not and really felt bad about what he did then. And most of those there would have fired if needed to. I believe that is the case with most of the newly enlisted, most will follow whatever order given. It is the older members that have learned different. Even with NOPD, a friend now retired from there said he tried to tell the new officers you can't just go and take peoples guns, but they did not listen to him. They were doing what they were told to do. I still question why homeland security needs 1.6 million rounds of hp, being that is enough to shoot every man, woman, and child several times here in the states. Are they gonna arm the tsa and send them forth??:ohreally:

    There are way more than 1.6 million people in the states, like 200 times that.
     

    Bayoupiper

    New Curmudgeon
    Rating - 100%
    4   0   0
    Apr 28, 2008
    5,099
    36
    Iowa, LA
    This past week a man calls in to a radio show. Don't remember if former enlisted or still is but he said he was on the ground during Katrina and had orders to shoot if resistance occurred. He said at that time being newly enlisted he would have as he wanted to do a good job following orders. He said now he would not and really felt bad about what he did then. And most of those there would have fired if needed to. I believe that is the case with most of the newly enlisted, most will follow whatever order given. It is the older members that have learned different. Even with NOPD, a friend now retired from there said he tried to tell the new officers you can't just go and take peoples guns, but they did not listen to him. They were doing what they were told to do. I still question why homeland security needs 1.6 million rounds of hp, being that is enough to shoot every man, woman, and child several times here in the states. Are they gonna arm the tsa and send them forth??:ohreally:



    We were told to defend ourselves.
    To return fire if we were fired upon and could engage the shooter(s).
    We were never told to shoot unarmed resistors.

    When they instructed us to confiscate firearms, my agency refused as did the National Guard units with us.

    The only ones I personally saw taking firearms were NOPD officers.


    Regardless, firearms were taken.
    Not as many as the media would like you to think, but even one was too many.
    I met no one down there who was armed that acted in any threatening manner towards us.


    From what I saw after Katrina, I really do not think there will be enough "Feds" willing to go out and actually take firearms from people.



    .
     

    Peacemaker

    Well-Known Member
    Silver Member
    Rating - 100%
    5   0   0
    Feb 10, 2012
    1,809
    83
    Slidell, La
    I was just commenting that I was noticing a trend. First police are bad, now military is bad, I wasn't sure if it was all people who wear uniforms or what.
    Man... You are ridiculous..

    I don't have a problem with police or anybody else in uniform..
     
    Last edited:

    Jack

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    40   0   0
    Dec 9, 2010
    8,602
    63
    Covington
    Man... You are ridiculous..

    I don't have a problem with police or anybody else in uniform..

    I must either have misread your post or misjudged your character. I would've sworn you said something along the lines of the troops would shoot civilians, or be shot. Personally I take issue with anyone who shoots civilians or our service members. So, do you no longer think they would shoot civilians or do you not have an issue with that?

    I don't think a lot of the people on here realize what they are saying when they say it.
     

    Staff online

    Forum statistics

    Threads
    196,187
    Messages
    1,552,495
    Members
    29,393
    Latest member
    jamesernestomurray
    Top Bottom