<SNIP>
1. Sgt Reavis is very cool to talk to, and he is DEFINITELY ON OUR SIDE. Extremely knowledgeable about second amendment issues and a strong supporter. His comment when asked why they were so backlogged was," It is like a whole population of people suddenly woke up and realized it was time they needed to get a permit, like it wasn't all along" or something to that effect.
<SNIP>
***NOTE*** Sgt Reavis is definitely moving the program in the right direction. I personally look forward to the changes he has in mind. He is working on some of the gaps in the program, most which work directly to our benefit and the issues we have raised here.
Please be patient, because he has his people working as hard as he can. FYI, this conversation went well past 5:00 PM, and I could hear is people leaving in the background and he was still working.
Sounds like a good replacement for SGT. Starnes whom I found to be both knowledgable and helpful.
How many apps does LSP process a year? Multiply that by $100. That's how much they have to run the department. Divide by number of employees, operating costs, building costs, printing costs, etc. It is probably nearly a break even situation.
that's kinda what I was getting at - perhaps I could have phrased it differently, like couldn't they use some help in staffing/funding at least temporarily.
<SNIP>
4. On the subject of MEM and OC: I was all for MEM until he settled for enough money to buy a motorcycle. If he were serious about fighting for the right to OC then he should have settled for his legal expenses plus $1. And done it openly. Now I see it as he was trying to profit. The rest of the group is doing it for attention.
<SNIP>
Having talked to Mark about this myself, I can say that, actually, it apparently was mostly a lawyer problem. He had to change lawyers after Katrina, as his original lawyer ran into some trouble of his own in the aftermath in New Orleans (that story is in Gordon Hutchinson's book, BTW); and the second lawyer essentially told Mark that settling was the only solution he would take the case for. If you've ever read any of Mark's pre-settlement posts about his case, you know that he wanted more than a simple solution as punishment for the GPD; so a symbolic award was out of the question. That's as close an understanding as I can gather from what little Mark can publicly say about the case as the settlement contained a non-disclosure clause.
And as for the rest of the OCDO folks only doing it for attention, that's not entirely fair. Founders Mike Stollenwerk and John Pierce have grown into published gun rights writers who are often quoted in the media. There's a public education component to OCing for sure (and in many other states OCDO members have dramatically improved the public image of ALL gun owners - see Michigan and Wisconsin for some recent examples); but I do appreciate your kind words that OC is sometimes a necessity for various valid reasons. We certainly do NOT want to rile up people against right to carry (which is why we always check with the proprietor of whatever restraunt we would like to hold our meet-up first, out of courtesy); but in every group (even BS.com) there are always a few who are, shall we say, somewhat embarrassing to the group.