After doing some research myself and reading up on how many acres per hunter.... I'm really thinking we should maybe find some land that has river access and use as camping/recreation/fishing/small game hunting. I don't see us getting land for use as deer hunting unless we knock it down to a 10 person buy in. Not trying to knock anything here, just seems realistic. Also, I don't see why we couldn't have a small area to pop off some rounds and plink for enjoyment.
Bayoushooter Hunting Lease?
- Thread starter my-rifle
- Start date
The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.
Member Benefits:
Fewer Ads! Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership Discuss anti-gun legislation Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses Discover free outdoor shooting areas View up to date on firearm-related events Share photos & video with other members ...and so much more!
Member Benefits:
I just know growing up if my family would have had something like this I'm sure I wouldn't have grown up doing the things I did. I'm very open about my past as I'm not embarrassed to admit it, hopefully it may help someone realize how stupid it is and not do it themselves. I say everyone speak up and state what options you would want. Considering we can do some of these on smaller parcels of land we may be able to get off cheaper and still have something we can enjoy.
I'm going to leave out shooting range since no matter what we should be able to do this in moderation without DEQ being involved.
I'll start a list of things we could post in a poll as options -
Fish/small game hunt/camping
Large game hunting/camping
Recreation/Camping/Small game hunt
Everyone throw in ideas, and everyone who is interested please don't think I'm trying to step on toes or bash a want.
I'm going to leave out shooting range since no matter what we should be able to do this in moderation without DEQ being involved.
I'll start a list of things we could post in a poll as options -
Fish/small game hunt/camping
Large game hunting/camping
Recreation/Camping/Small game hunt
Everyone throw in ideas, and everyone who is interested please don't think I'm trying to step on toes or bash a want.
gbundersea
Just my 2¢
"selling to fund their own venture on our land."
It was jmcrawf1 who used that phrase, but the concerns are legit. Timber and mineral rights can be negotiated, and the terms put into a contract. For example, timber rights could be for X years only, and the activities could be limited to a specific area, or extent, etc.
Also, the standard real estate contract states that even if mineral rights are retained, that no surface activity is allowed. Any such activity would have to be agreed upon. Without surface activity, mineral rights automatically revert to the new owner after 10 years.
Parties can agree to anything, including shared timber rights, as long as it's clearly spelled out and agreed upon. Once any negotiated terms are in a signed contract, it's binding.
The sellers may be very negotiable on that 166 acre tract, as it's been for sale close to 2 years!
It was jmcrawf1 who used that phrase, but the concerns are legit. Timber and mineral rights can be negotiated, and the terms put into a contract. For example, timber rights could be for X years only, and the activities could be limited to a specific area, or extent, etc.
Also, the standard real estate contract states that even if mineral rights are retained, that no surface activity is allowed. Any such activity would have to be agreed upon. Without surface activity, mineral rights automatically revert to the new owner after 10 years.
Parties can agree to anything, including shared timber rights, as long as it's clearly spelled out and agreed upon. Once any negotiated terms are in a signed contract, it's binding.
The sellers may be very negotiable on that 166 acre tract, as it's been for sale close to 2 years!
http://cabelastp.rapmls.com/scripts...l&ARGUMENTS=-N272648381,-N3852,-N,-A,-N633861
Already has a clearing for camping and shooting, lol.
Already has a clearing for camping and shooting, lol.
mcinfantry
*Banned*
look at it like this....
166 acres will only support so much hunting... as development encroaches, it will support less.
id be willing to buy in one of the 20 NON HUNTING people. you will have to limit hunters from bringing guests.... etc...
166 acres will only support so much hunting... as development encroaches, it will support less.
id be willing to buy in one of the 20 NON HUNTING people. you will have to limit hunters from bringing guests.... etc...
gbundersea
Just my 2¢
These Cabelas properties are in the MLS too. Most if not all of them have no water or road access, and they're priced at $1500+ per acre.
Also, they do NOT convey mineral rights; not sure about timber.
The 166AC tract I'm talking about has both road and water access.
The 166 acres could support 30 hunter just not at the same time. If we scheduled hunts, we'd never have more than, say 6 - 10 hunters in the forest at the same time. If they had pre-assigned areas set by lottery, then it wouldn't be an issue.
gbundersea
Just my 2¢
Land search link
Click here for search
Use the above link to return search results for land listed in the Greater Baton Rouge MLS with the following criteria:
Minimum 30 acres
Maximum total price $300K
Results are sorted from highest price down.
Let me know if you want me to find out the inside details on that 166-acre tract.
Click here for search
Use the above link to return search results for land listed in the Greater Baton Rouge MLS with the following criteria:
Minimum 30 acres
Maximum total price $300K
Results are sorted from highest price down.
Let me know if you want me to find out the inside details on that 166-acre tract.
gbundersea
Just my 2¢
Will do! As soon as I have it, I'll post it on this thread. I'll talk to them in person and try to find out just WHY it's so cheap, along with other general info.
I see that its access to the river is a small corridor, and from the looks of the land it floods a lot. It's covered with palmettos. They usually grow in "bottomland", don't they? I'm guessing that's why the low price.
