Cliven Bundy Cattle Rancher Situation

The Best online firearms community in Louisiana.

Member Benefits:

  • Fewer Ads!
  • Discuss all aspects of firearm ownership
  • Discuss anti-gun legislation
  • Buy, sell, and trade in the classified section
  • Chat with Local gun shops, ranges, trainers & other businesses
  • Discover free outdoor shooting areas
  • View up to date on firearm-related events
  • Share photos & video with other members
  • ...and so much more!
  • JBP55

    La. CHP Instructor #409
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    338   0   0
    Apr 15, 2008
    17,097
    113
    Walker
    *For more than two decades, cattle have been grazed illegally on public lands in northeast Clark County,* the BLM said in a statement. *BLM and (the National Park Service) have made repeated attempts to resolve this matter administratively and judicially. Impoundment of cattle illegally grazing on public lands is an option of last resort.*
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    JB I think we know why NOW at the present it's (unlawful).

    But from his perspective. His family has been there for over a hundred years
    with their cattle.

    THEN, Big Gov comes in,
    declares it a Land Management Area
    and starts charging folks grazing fees.

    In his eyes, he feels like Native Americans did. :dunno:

    I'm not saying I agree with his resistance per say, or that I would do the same.
    But I do feel like I understand his frustration.
     
    Last edited:

    SpeedRacer

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    92   0   0
    Feb 23, 2007
    14,347
    38
    Mandeville, LA
    It was never his land. He is fortunate that he was able to use it for so long. Still wasn't his. There is no such thing as land that doesn't belong to SOMEONE. If his family decided to build a cattle business based on land they didn't own that was pretty dumb if you ask me.
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    It was never his land. He is fortunate that he was able to use it for so long. Still wasn't his. There is no such thing as land that doesn't belong to SOMEONE. If his family decided to build a cattle business based on land they didn't own that was pretty dumb if you ask me.

    Yea I hear ya. But who knows who owned what in 1850?
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    So you're saying this guy's family owned 600,000 acres of land yet he has no way to prove it? I'm pretty sure even in 1850 you couldn't just claim 600K acres because your cows crapped on it.

    Noooo I'm not saying that.

    It would just be interesting to know who owns/owned it since/when his family has been on it.
    (Supposedly 150 years)
    He's not claiming 600,000 Acres is he?
    and if they didn't own it,
    who let them act like they did
    until the Federal Government had to get involved
    and say different? :dunno:
     

    SpeedRacer

    Well-Known Member
    Rating - 100%
    92   0   0
    Feb 23, 2007
    14,347
    38
    Mandeville, LA
    Noooo I'm not saying that.

    It would just be interesting to know who owns/owned it since/when his family has been on it.
    (Supposedly 150 years)
    He's not claiming 600,000 Acres is he?
    and if they didn't own it,
    who let them act like they did
    until the Federal Government had to get involved
    and say different? :dunno:

    I would assume the National Park Service. It says he stopped paying grazing fees to the federal government, which means at one point he was paying grazing fees, but doesn't say for how long. His family coulda been paying for 100 years. Either way it is a pretty good indicator he knew the land wasn't his.
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    I would assume the National Park Service. It says he stopped paying grazing fees to the federal government, which means at one point he was paying grazing fees, but doesn't say for how long. His family coulda been paying for 100 years. Either way it is a pretty good indicator he knew the land wasn't his.

    Post #11 is where I mentioned that earlier.
    I don't think the Grazing Fee is 100 years old,
    b/c apparently the fee didn't exist
    until the land management was declared.

    the BLM canceled his federal grazing permit 20 years ago after the rancher refused to accept new land-use rules for protecting the threatened desert tortoise and stopped paying his fees.

    Bundy’s beef with federal land management officials dates back to 1993, according to federal officials, when Bundy’s allotment for grazing his cattle on public land was modified to include protections for the desert tortoise. Bundy, who told the Associated Press his family has been ranching this part of Nevada since the 1870s, did not accept the modified terms, and continued to let his cattle graze anyway.

    This is how I understand the timeline;
    So his cattle was feeding freely.
    The Gov claims it and then charges fee to graze.
    He starts paying.
    Shortly after... Gov proposes new land-rules
    (of which he obviously didn't agree with)
    in order to protect the turtle.
    Rancher refuses to participate any longer.

    My question is, who owns that 600k? or did...
    If not ALWAYS the Gov, who then?
    ...and if no one ever did, why does the Gov. just get to come in
    and claim the stake down on 600k acres?
    Yes, yes b/c they can .... but really that sounds like horse ****.

    ----------

    The son has been released....
    ....but then this....

    Clivens son promises a major change in this situation between rancher & the government to happen tomorrow Thurs 4-10-14 and it is supposed to broadcast live on the Josh Trolly show.


    Maybe they talked some sense into him? :dunno:

    We can only hope .....
     
    Last edited:

    oleheat

    Professional Amateur
    Premium Member
    Rating - 100%
    3   0   0
    May 18, 2009
    13,775
    38
    Hope it all works out peacefully.



    But I can't help but wonder....what in Hades are these cattle grazing on- rocks? LOL



    sy8uba6e.jpg
     

    Vanilla Gorilla

    The Gringo Pistolero
    Rating - 100%
    26   0   0
    Feb 22, 2008
    6,468
    36
    Post #11 is where I mentioned that earlier.
    I don't think the Grazing Fee is 100 years old,
    b/c apparently the fee didn't exist
    until the land management was declared.





    This is how I understand the timeline;
    So his cattle was feeding freely.
    The Gov claims it and then charges fee to graze.
    He starts paying.
    Shortly after... Gov proposes new land-rules
    (of which he obviously didn't agree with)
    in order to protect the turtle.
    Rancher refuses to participate any longer.

    My question is, who owns that 600k? or did...
    If not ALWAYS the Gov, who then?
    ...and if no one ever did, why does the Gov. just get to come in
    and claim the stake down on 600k acres?
    Yes, yes b/c they can .... but really that sounds like horse ****.

    ----------

    The son has been released....
    ....but then this....




    Maybe they talked some sense into him? :dunno:

    We can only hope .....


    BLM manages Federal Land. The land became the Feds when it wasn't claimed by homesteaders. Basically after the choice bits were picked the remainder became Public Land. It's why all of the BLM Property is West of The Mississippi River.
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    BLM manages Federal Land. The land became the Feds when it wasn't claimed by homesteaders. Basically after the choice bits were picked the remainder became Public Land. It's why all of the BLM Property is West of The Mississippi River.

    Good Info. Man I can't believe 600,000 acres was sitting out there unclaimed..... :eek3:
     

    Hitman

    ® ™
    Rating - 100%
    13   0   0
    Sep 4, 2008
    16,034
    36
    Lake Charles
    For perspective, there are approximately 2,500,000,000 acres in America.

    Yea true that. I guess it's not exactly PRIME real estate.

    Hell only Old Ass ranchers and Dry Ass Turtles live there :dogkeke:


    Same Species....even drier.... :doh:

    Desert_tortoise.jpg



    :mamoru:
     
    Last edited:
    Top Bottom