Sin-ster
GM of 4 Letter Outbursts
I type roughly 160 WPM, stream of consciousness. That took me less time to write than it would have taken you to read and comprehend it-- which clearly didn't happen.
To try to get you to understand what "recoil management" really means would be an effort indeed. My guess is that this entire thread could have been dedicated to the cause, and fallen woefully short. And that's why I didn't bother.
But it's become painfully obvious that despite an impressive vocabulary and reasonably solid grasp of the English language, you really struggle with comprehension of facts and argument formation. Some of the highlights from you last post:
Using an example of someone who survived a headshot at close range to strengthen an argument about lethality. (Certainly happens with all pistol calibers, but... probably not something you want to try to twist into "OMG 5.7 is awesome".)
Expecting us to put a lot of stock in these accounts, despite one containing reference to the use of "an old fashioned pistol", while you later claim the revolver was never used.
Referring to the M9 as venerable and insinuating that its failure weakens the non-5.7 stance, despite the fact that it's much loathed-- on this board, and by those who have carried it in anger. (Indication that the only thing you spend time researching is the Five-seveN, perhaps? That's a pretty widely accepted fact in the online firearms community...)
Talking about "unverified internet accounts" and then making statements like:
And...
All the while trying to make a case for a gun that's easy to shoot accurately and quickly. So which is it, Sherlock-- aimed fire, or random spraying? Oh, I know-- it's whatever combination of the two best suits your position. Duh!
And on, and on, and on.
But yeah. Feel free to twist words around to help you out-- as per "not worth the time to <accomplish specific task>", suddenly transformed into "1000 word rant despite not having time". I don't have time to talk about recoil management ≠ I don't have time to talk. That's 100 level stuff-- get it down before you graduate!
And don't YOU love someone who can't come up with something better than, "Cool story Bro"! Somewhere out there, that's got to be recognized as the universal symbol of the idiot's white flag...
Any other pop culture, video game or internet memes you wanna pull out, go right ahead. Just be sure to tack it into my list of examples about willfully/ignorantly weakening one's own argument, found ^^^.
To try to get you to understand what "recoil management" really means would be an effort indeed. My guess is that this entire thread could have been dedicated to the cause, and fallen woefully short. And that's why I didn't bother.
But it's become painfully obvious that despite an impressive vocabulary and reasonably solid grasp of the English language, you really struggle with comprehension of facts and argument formation. Some of the highlights from you last post:
Using an example of someone who survived a headshot at close range to strengthen an argument about lethality. (Certainly happens with all pistol calibers, but... probably not something you want to try to twist into "OMG 5.7 is awesome".)
Expecting us to put a lot of stock in these accounts, despite one containing reference to the use of "an old fashioned pistol", while you later claim the revolver was never used.
Referring to the M9 as venerable and insinuating that its failure weakens the non-5.7 stance, despite the fact that it's much loathed-- on this board, and by those who have carried it in anger. (Indication that the only thing you spend time researching is the Five-seveN, perhaps? That's a pretty widely accepted fact in the online firearms community...)
Talking about "unverified internet accounts" and then making statements like:
This spraying in a fanlike motion is most likely responsible for a lot of the "limb shots" as he was just trying to hit as many people as possible during this period.
And...
I'm wondering if this didn't happen to a lot of people - 5.7mm bullets flying around a room and cutting through cubicle walls as well as people's limbs and penetrating yet more victims. A cubicle wall as well as a human forearm isn't going to slow a 5.7mm bullet very much at all.
All the while trying to make a case for a gun that's easy to shoot accurately and quickly. So which is it, Sherlock-- aimed fire, or random spraying? Oh, I know-- it's whatever combination of the two best suits your position. Duh!
And on, and on, and on.
But yeah. Feel free to twist words around to help you out-- as per "not worth the time to <accomplish specific task>", suddenly transformed into "1000 word rant despite not having time". I don't have time to talk about recoil management ≠ I don't have time to talk. That's 100 level stuff-- get it down before you graduate!
And don't YOU love someone who can't come up with something better than, "Cool story Bro"! Somewhere out there, that's got to be recognized as the universal symbol of the idiot's white flag...
Any other pop culture, video game or internet memes you wanna pull out, go right ahead. Just be sure to tack it into my list of examples about willfully/ignorantly weakening one's own argument, found ^^^.
Last edited: