SpeedRacer
Well-Known Member
I don't believe there is much of a diffrence in lethality vis a vis 16" vs. 10.3".
Especially at home defense distances.
I don't believe there is much of a diffrence in lethality vis a vis 16" vs. 10.3".
Because I am not enamored with the Tavor or any of the modern bullpups. They lack the track record or reliability I am looking for, they can't be fired from the support side without mechanical modification, the manual of arms is weird, and with the availability of JHPs and ammo like the 77gr SMK and TMK I don't believe there is much of a diffrence in lethality vis a vis 16" vs. 10.3".
Most 5.56/.223 ammo, particularly JHP stuff has less residual penetration through interior walls than 9mm Ball. By design the projectiles are low mass/high velocity they become unstable in barriers and fragment. Drywall is a particularly difficult medium for them. There will be some secondary frag but im far less concerned about than I am with buck shot or slugs and I don't consider pistol ammo to be less of a risk nor do I find it to be sufficiently lethal.
My Glock 20 or 21. 15 rounds of 10mm or 13 rounds of .45 ACP.
Any cons to going with a lower grain JHP? Wouldn't that make it less likely to penetrate multiple walls? My twist rate is 1:9 on my only rifle now, i'm assuming even at short distances (in home), it'd be better to stay with a lower grain?
You are comparing the 556 round to 9mm ball ammo, but most if not all of us use a decent jhp in our sd guns. I know I have multiple mags of federal hst loaded for each pistol hanging next to my safe.
Is there an inexpensive 223 commercial HP that you would recommend? I feel like i need to swap 55 grain FMJ for something else if I'm going to depend on the rifle but I want to be able to afford to run some through the gun to test it.
Xm193 is what I use. If it does the job I would bea happy to stick with it. Anything else would need to come in around the same price. Thanks Nilla.