While not supporting either side's actions, after reading about this Grisham dude, there is some seriously twisted stuff with this guy.
Well lets see it
While not supporting either side's actions, after reading about this Grisham dude, there is some seriously twisted stuff with this guy.
Oh. I thought you guys were talking about ....
Its some guy's blog, but sure was an interesting read.
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/st...as-police-some-facts-opinion-and-analysis.htm
If he wasn't a complete douche then he probably wouldn't have been arrested and the video wouldn't be on to be discussed.
OTOH, the cops handled that poorly. The douche will probably be riding a new motorcycle soon. Him being a douche does not give them the right... Lets face it, LEO's deal with complete douches all the time.
Just curious, where can I find the douche regulations in the criminal code?
It's not in the criminal code - it's one of those things your Father should have instilled in ya.Just curious, where can I find the douche regulations in the criminal code?
It's not in the criminal code - it's one of those things your Father should have instilled in ya.
Yup. Just like it is legal for me to openly sexually leer at some guys wife or daughter in public but it is illegal for you to punch me in the teeth for it. Legal does not equal Right.
Yup. Like smoking and littering.
He was first charged with resisting arrest, but the charges were later downgraded
The "Old" default charge to cover any situation!
Now on a serious note: Why was he found guilty in the trial? Was the video hidden from the jury?